Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Educational institutes are responsible for dissuading students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. Educational institutions are aware of a students academic performance, so they are able to guide the students on the basis of their performance.
Although, success of a person cannot be determined by their academic performance, but their potential for success can be assumed by taking into account extracurricular activities or aptitude tests or personality tests. Educational institutions have valuable information on the students which, if used effectively, can help a student choose the most successful career path available to them.
The aptitude of a student to succeed in a field should not be the only factor in deciding the field of study. Preference and interest should also be taken into account.
Most students only consider their interest in a subject when deciding on a field to study, thinking they will be able to work hard to be successful. For some it works, but others are not so lucky. That is why students should consider their aptitude and interest when it comes to pursuing a field of study. When an individual has to decide on a field of study, they have spent most of their time in an educational institute. As these institutes are aware of a students interest and performance, they are an appropriate authority to help students in identifying the fields of study they should pursue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | jenniferjack07 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | Kiho Park | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | lanhhoang | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | lanhhoang | 16 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | AkkineniAnuhya4 | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 171, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a student' or simply 'students'?
Suggestion: a student; students
.... Educational institutions are aware of a students academic performance, so they are able ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 460, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...ute. As these institutes are aware of a students interest and performance, they are an a...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 58.6224719101 61% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1216.0 2235.4752809 54% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 236.0 442.535393258 53% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15254237288 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 4.55969084622 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03030691231 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 215.323595506 52% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.478813559322 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 704.065955056 55% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8031431589 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.545454545 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4545454545 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.18181818182 5.21951772744 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.422089921483 0.243740707755 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.190082268653 0.0831039109588 229% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.231056583719 0.0758088955206 305% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.280769381941 0.150359130593 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.210755859712 0.0667264976115 316% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 100.480337079 49% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.8971910112 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.