The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years
The line graph depicts the number of trash manufactured by company A, company B and company C from 2000 to 2015. The units measured in tonnes.
Overall, the number of waste produced by company A showed a downward trend. However, company C experienced a significant rise throughout the period. The company B had some fluctuations.
Firstly, at the starting period, the amount of trash manufactured by company B and company C is around 8 tonnes and 4 tonnes respectively, then both rose to 10 and 6 tonnes in the period of 2005. The company C continuously increased through out the period, in 2010 it exceeded company B and at the end of the period, it reached the highest other than two with around 10 tonnes. Company B after 2005 started plummeting and in 2010 it overlaps with company C with around 7 tonnes. At last, company B reached the bottom position with 3 tonnes.
On the other hand, the company A produced waste of 12 tonnes in 2000 with higher than other company and then significantly declined for the whole period. At some point between 2010 and 2015, Company C took over company A for the peak position. At the last period 2015 company plummeted to 8 tonnes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-13 | Wardiati Yusuf | 60 | view |
| 2023-12-04 | klnhhhh01 | 70 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
- More and more people are relying on the private car as their major means of transportation. 73
- Percentage of UK people who consumed daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002, 2006 and 2010. 73
- The bar chart below gives information about vehicle ownership in China 87
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. 67
- In recent years, the family structure has changed, as well as family roles. What are the changes occurring? Do you think these changes are positive or negative? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 234, Rule ID: THROUGH_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'throughout'?
Suggestion: throughout
...5. The company C continuously increased through out the period, in 2010 it exceeded company...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 19, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n with 3 tonnes. On the other hand, the company A produced waste of 12 tonne...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, so, then, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 979.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70673076923 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73245732628 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.471153846154 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.2836813292 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.5833333333 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286662167054 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124135752036 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639366651009 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202162921184 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460300365994 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.74 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.