The bar chart shows the scores of teams A, B and C over four different seasons.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
You should write at least 150 words.
The bar graph illustrates the marks by Team A, B, C over the period of the year from 2002 to 2005.
Overall, team B holds the greatest score for all 4 seasons in the graph where team A had a 2nd place for the first two seasons. However, for the last two seasons team C replaces team B.
On the one hand, team B score in 2002 is 82 and it shrunk in 2003 by 22 while team A and team B score rose by 6 and 5 respectively in 2003. Previous year in 2002, team A had 5 scores and team C had 10 scores.
On the other hand, team B score was 43 in 2004 and followed by team A (score 35), team A score was rapidly increased by 24. Team C score diminished by 3 in the year 2004. In 2005, team B score was sharply increased to 55 from 43. Team C marks gradually decreased by 6 and the team B marks curtail to 8 from 35.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-25 | lordwind | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-14 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-28 | kallgou | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-08 | neethujithin | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-08 | neethujithin | 100 | view |
- The bar chart shows the scores of teams A, B and C over four different seasons. 56
- Eventually, technology will solve the most important environmental problems the world faces today. To what extent do you agree or disagree?Write at least 250 words. 56
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011. 67
- The diagram below shows the average hours of unpaid work per week done by people in different categories. (Unpaid work refers to such activities as childcare in the home, housework and gardening.)Describe the information presented below, comparing results 61
- The tables below give information about sales of fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 653.0 965.302439024 68% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 3.81871345029 4.92477711251 78% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.18204680792 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479532163743 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 166.5 283.868780488 59% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.0 1.45097560976 69% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.3171016913 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.5555555556 112.824112599 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175697957334 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0951139815502 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.022577046638 0.0843802449381 27% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118713297199 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.012612122293 0.0819641961636 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.1 13.2329268293 46% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 102.95 61.2550243902 168% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 3.6 10.3012195122 35% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 4.88 11.4140731707 43% => Coleman_liau_index is low.
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.33 8.06136585366 79% => OK
difficult_words: 19.0 40.7170731707 47% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 4.0 11.0658536585 36% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.