Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Educating children is more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking websites. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Educational system is one of the important pillar which would lead to flourishing a society. In today progressive world science play a significant role in prosperity of a society, so richer educational system means richer society. Some people believe that by using today's high technology devices and network the educating children become easier than past, whereas some others hold an opposite attitude. In my view, schooling students is easier task than before by getting benefit of new technology for two remarkable reasons.
First, children could learn vast amount of knowledge by spending time on social networking and other stuff. Learning novel complicated technologies and involving on them could increase the student’s creativity. Also, they could gain huge amount of information in every field so quickly which save them a lot of extra time to study and explore their lessons. For example, when I was kid, there was none of the today's equipment like computers, network, and so on. All the time, not only I should study boring books, but I also had to read several written resources for my projects which get me a lot of valuable time. Furthermore, the access to information was too hard that sometimes deprived students from expanding their knowledge. As you can see, today's technology, undoubtedly, enhance the children's learning.
Second, students could get familiar with different perspectives which increases their efficiency by spending time in social networks. If children curiosity is responded, their learning task become much easier. Kids could deal with various aspects of each project, be aware of world's most updated procedure and even see informing video by means of cell phone and other novel devices. For instance, statistics demonstrate that there is a direct relation between the time students spend on social networks and their efficiency in learning. Researchers' investigation among two groups of students reveals that students who have better access to new technology could absorb information quickly due to dealing with updated information cause a sharp rise in their thirsty for learning. If children had not spend time on social networks, they would not learn efficiently.
In conclusion, I do believe that today's time taking technology improve the students learning ability and make them easier. Not only students could require vast knowledge by these means, but also their familiarity with several perspective increase their creativity and efficiency. I think people should change their negative opinion about new invented devices.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at young age. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 415, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'todays'' or 'today's'?
Suggestion: todays'; today's
..., when I was kid, there was none of the todays equipment like computers, network, and ...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 799, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
...irsty for learning. If children had not spend time on social networks, they would not...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, second, so, whereas, as to, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2188.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 400.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7916292286 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5675 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 663.3 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5920130834 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.4 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211712076595 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0703148023859 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487645155051 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125238392865 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428529769263 0.0645574589148 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 10.9000537634 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.