In some countries young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies.
In many countries, young people are now taking a year beak after fishing high school and before beginning university as a new trend. Some people will take a year break to travel to other countries while others tend to get jobs to gain their experience for their life at the university. In my opinion, there are both benefit and drawback in this new trend but the advantages outweight the disadvantage one.
To begin with, youngsters will have chance to learn about new cultures where they choose to travel, make new friends and this will help them to upgrade their social skill which is not being taught at school. Secondly, teenagers will learn how to be independent by themselves when they travel alone or learn how to deal with problem when meet it. Moreover, having a job after finishing high school and before starting university will help them with the financial in the colleague's life and some experience when they start to get a real job from what learned at the university.
However, there are some drawback when youngsters take a year to travel or to work. Firstly, they will run out of money when they choose to travel to too far countries or too expensive one. This might lead them to use the money that they have been save for college life. Secondly, when they took(take) a job to work as their part-time and continue to work when starting university this may take away lots of time from them even time to study for the exam. Moreover, they might find study is too bored and will cut it away when they can be independent in their own financial.
To cut the nutshell, taking a gap year between high school and university is growing and this a good trend to help youngsters from taking a break and choosing which way they want to be. From my view, governments should encourage teenagers to travel or to take a small job to gain their experience from both school life and upgrade their social skill.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | Châu Cương Chí | 89 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | mone49 | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | anhoanguyenquin | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | anhoanguyenquin | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-08 | thanhlan0201 | 78 | view |
- Topic 9: It is generally acknowledged that families are now not as close as they used to be. Give possible reasons and your recommendations. 84
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish. Why do you think this is happening? What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced? 78
- Internet when used as a source of information, has more drawbacks than advantages. To what extent do you agree with this statement? 78
- Internet when used as a source of information, has more drawbacks than advantages. To what extent do you agree with this statement? 78
- In some countries young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 374, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ack in this new trend but the advantages outweight the disadvantage one. To beg...
^^
Line 3, column 470, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'colleagues'' or 'colleague's'?
Suggestion: colleagues'; colleague's
...ill help them with the financial in the colleagues life and some experience when they star...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1576.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62170087977 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37453372315 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.466275659824 0.561755894193 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.423726269 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.230769231 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2307692308 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15384615385 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256765038777 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0992764646786 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0759878495912 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163262655968 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464277784416 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 12.4159519038 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.92 8.58950901804 81% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 78.4519038076 55% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.