In some countries young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decided to do this.
It is thought by some people that young high-school learners should be worked or gone travelling for a year before entering the universities. This trend would create certain benefits, but there will also some drawbacks.
On the one hand, when young students stop to study in a short time would arise some disadvantages related to losing learning motivation. One evident weakness is that many students are likely to discourage because of their future learning. It finds hard for them to commerce a new journey due to forgetting what they have learned at high schools. It is assumed that if students experienced the wonderful trip or had the part-time job, they would not go on studying. The anwer is they feel more comfortable and relaxing without getting stressed with a huge assignments. Therefore, hesitating to study makes students lose their learning inspiration.
On the other hand, it is obvious that when students enroll immediately at the universities, which would bring about a range of benefits in terms of widening their knowledge. Firstly, students may have a great opportunity with new lessons. For example, when a student majors in English, they will be trained how to become a good English teach with useful techniques and various lesson plans. They make more different to use what to learn into practice based on the training sessions. Secondly, technical usage or presentation skills are not occurred in the high school curriculum, which may assist students to develop their horizons.
In conclusion, there are plus points for students to delay their studying for a year regarding insight developments. However, the downside would emerge consequently in terms of absence of learning inspiration.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | Châu Cương Chí | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-08 | thanhlan0201 | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-19 | Muhammad Waleed Khan | 61 | view |
| 2019-09-14 | Jones | 61 | view |
| 2019-09-12 | Milan karki | 78 | view |
- Some people could be naturally good leaders Others believe that people can learn leadership skills Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- The graph below shows the rate of smoking per 1000 people in Someland from 1960 to 2000
- Some people think that physical strength is important for success in sport while other people think that mental strength is more important Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Human activities have negative effects on plants and animals species Some people think it is too late to fix these issues Others believe there are possible solutions to improve the situation Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Governments should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion Others support building more and wider roads Discuss both of these viewpoints and give your opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 556, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'assignment'?
Suggestion: assignment
...ng without getting stressed with a huge assignments. Therefore, hesitating to study makes s...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1449.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26909090909 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85460335784 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621818181818 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.3842064237 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.86666666667 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157105628915 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0534762890155 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0906550953041 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128916856659 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108997553139 0.056905535591 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.