A few major languages are increasingly spoken in different countries, while the usage of others is rapidly declining. Is this a positive or a negative development?
These days, that the prevalence of international languages renders minority languages obsolete has sparked considerable public debate. Although this trend is not without merits, its drawbacks justify them.
There are a multitude of manifest advantages of this phenomena to the societies. First, since the number of people using global language such as English and Chinese has been increased, communication between human in different parts of the world will be more effective than ever. For example, if only a few languages are spoken, there will be no language barrier, which facilitates the way people exchange information and travel to other countries, by extension, reduces the need for interpretation and translation. Moreover, the increase in usage of global languages is also conducive to trading as it helps international companies connect to their partners and expand their business around the world. That means, more career opportunities would be created as a business opens factory in other places, which enhances the living standard of the locals.
Nevertheless, under no circumstances should the demerits of this trend be marginalized. First, because a language represents culture of a nation, if one language disappears, a whole way of life will also vanish with it, leading to the loss of cultural diversity that makes societies more interesting. Not to mention, the domination of global languages is also to blame for the rise of language discrimination throughout the world. Consequently, some individuals may hold a linguistic prejudice against someone due to their use of language, and this may eventually result in unfair treatments in some extent. Examples may be clearly seen in the workplace and in education systems, where victims’ well-being, self-esteem, self-worth, and social relations are often severely impacted by discriminators.
In conclusion, although the domination of some international languages does have some tangible benefits, these pale into insignificance when compared with the drawbacks. By protecting mother languages, governments can preserve the value of national culture and alleviate the consequences of linguicism for society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-30 | Hoang Minh | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | Pham Van Nhan | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | Kiệt Bùi | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | vantran2297 | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | quynhan1995 | 61 | view |
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to live with it. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people believe that the range of technology available to individuals today is increasing the gap between rich people and poor people. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Sending criminals to prison is not the best method of dealing with them. Education and job training are better ways to help them. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- Pollution of rivers, lakes and seas is a major concern for people who seek to protect the environment. What are the possible causes of water pollution, and what effects does this have on animal life and human society? 84
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to live with it. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 49, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...e a multitude of manifest advantages of this phenomena to the societies. First, sinc...
^^^^
Line 9, column 807, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...en severely impacted by discriminators. In conclusion, although the domination o...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1873.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74539877301 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22224918869 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613496932515 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8711341704 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.785714286 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2857142857 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167646595876 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0519923948875 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0392981801096 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0899898012229 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.056738665072 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.37 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.15 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.