Scientist say that in the future, humanity will speak the same language. Do you think the advantages will outweigh the disadvantages?
In these years, that many experts anticipate that only one language will be spoken by humans has been a subject of considerable public debate. Although the negative effects of this trend seem plausible, I believe its benefits justify them.
There are several manifest demerits when linguistic homogenization occurs. First, if only one language is spoken throughout the world, it will pose hazards to national cultures as customs and traditions have been always embedded with a language. In fact, if a language disappears, a whole way of life is likely to vanish with it, rendering the loss of national identity unavoidable. In addition to, the complete domination of one language might come at the expense of human social diversity. Consequently, that all people across the globe communicate, think and behave in the similar way does equal a more tedious life.
Nevertheless, under no circumstances should the merits of linguistic assimilation be marginalized. First, since the rise of global language is a facilitator of cross-culture communication, it contributes to the development of national economy. A tangible example to illustrate this point is Singapore, where English is deemed as a mother tongue. By replacing their dialect by English, the Singapore government has opened venues for foreign penetration into the country, making it one of the great powers in term of economy in the world. Moreover, as all materials will be translated into only one language, the exchange of information such as know-how and technologies will be tremendously stimulated. That means, we, humans can cultivate knowledge in various fields such as science, math, and so forth.
In conclusion, despite having some disadvantages, I firmly believe that the trend is more of a positive development as not only is it conducive to the global economy but also human horizons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-15 | vantran2297 | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-19 | Garrett | 11 | view |
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to live with it. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The technology development has affected social relationships from person to person Do the negative aspects of this trend outweigh the positive aspects 50
- Pollution of rivers, lakes and seas is a major concern for people who seek to protect the environment. What are the possible causes of water pollution, and what effects does this have on animal life and human society? 84
- Scientist say that in the future, humanity will speak the same language. Do you think the advantages will outweigh the disadvantages? 84
- Many employees may work at home with modern technology Some people claim that it benefits only worker but not employers Do you agree or disagree 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 204, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[8]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put between 'have' and 'been'.
Suggestion: have always been
...onal cultures as customs and traditions have been always embedded with a language. In fact, if a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1585.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39115646259 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12376959905 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622448979592 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6485824202 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.214285714 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114328043267 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0333573730572 0.084324248473 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444023418313 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0652866107644 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0206404415627 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.