The pie charts below describe about the average of household expensitures in A country in 1950 and 2010
The pie charts below describe about the average of household expenditures in A country in 1950 and 2010 or six decades. Overall, the pie charts show that that the highest expenditures was food and the lowest expenditures was housing.
In six decades, there was significantly increased increased in the household expenditures in a country especially in food aspect that reaches twenty-three percent. Other aspect that also increase was in the other aspect of expenditures for about fifteen percent, followed by transportation aspect which is only eleven percent. Along with that, health care expenditures and education did not change a lot, only two percent and zero point three percent. While the only aspect that went down was housing that change dramatically for about fifty percent.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-21 | nguyen thanh sang | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-30 | Mostakima Tawrin | 73 | view |
| 2022-06-26 | Sarina2021 | 78 | view |
| 2022-06-26 | Sarina2021 | 78 | view |
| 2022-06-05 | quytnee | 84 | view |
- The pie chart below describe about the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years 56
- The charts below show one government's spending on culture and education in 1995 and 2005 and the number of people participating in arts events in the same years. 67
- The charts below shows about government's spending on culture and education in 1915 and 2005, and the number of people participating in arts events in the same years. 67
- The charts below show one government s spending on culture and education in 1995 and 2005 and the number of people participating in Arts events in the same years 84
- The pie charts below gives information about the proportion of carbohydrates protein and fat in three different types of diet 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 150, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: that
...x decades. Overall, the pie charts show that that the highest expenditures was food and t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 42, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: increased
...In six decades, there was significantly increased increased in the household expenditures in a coun...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 16.0 33.7804878049 47% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 670.0 965.302439024 69% => OK
No of words: 124.0 196.424390244 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40322580645 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.33699396548 3.73543355544 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.910474821 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 71.0 106.607317073 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572580645161 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 204.3 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.1307691 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 111.666666667 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.16666666667 5.23603664747 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224257921431 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159614186673 0.103423049105 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.254006456763 0.0843802449381 301% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255843225021 0.15604864568 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.201530928599 0.0819641961636 246% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.