Hydrogen based fuel cell engines have advantages over internal combustion engines.
The reading and listening both about the hydrogen based fuel cell engine and internal combustion engines. The author states that, Hydrogen based fuel cell engines have advantages over internal combustion engines and give three reasons of support. However, the lecturer supposes that, there are many disadvantage of fuel cell engine too and refutes each of author points.
First, the passage posits that, internal combustion engine depends on petroleum like gasoline or diesel fuel and these are finite resource. Because of limited source, we can't use them for a long time. The lecturer contradicts this point by explaining that, Hydrogen is not easily available and we can't use this directly from water. It is very hard to produce pure liquid Hydrogen.
Second, the reading expresses that, hydrogen based fuel solve the problems of pollution. Although, the lecture claims that, the process of produce Hydrogen and purification Hydrogen need burning coil or oil. And the company who produce the hydrogen and burning coil or oil are causes of the pollution.
Third, the reading implies that, it saves money too. Nevertheless, the writer indicates that, hydrogen based engine need platum metal and the it is very expensive metal.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-14 | f.jafary66@gmail.com | 81 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | pg | 66 | view |
- Large amount of money is important or earn money for only comfortable living is important. 60
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoni 54
- In order for any work of art—for example, a film, a novel, a poem, or a song—to have merit, it must be understandable to most people. 50
- There is a writing in which it is stated that appearing on television brings benefits to professors, universities and public. On the contarary, in the listening passage the lecturer opposes this idea. Summarize the point mad in the lecture, being sure to 63
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 295, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun disadvantage seems to be countable; consider using: 'many disadvantages'.
Suggestion: many disadvantages
..., the lecturer supposes that, there are many disadvantage of fuel cell engine too and refutes eac...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 151, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd these are finite resource. Because of limited source, we cant use them for a l...
^^
Line 3, column 172, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...esource. Because of limited source, we cant use them for a long time. The lecturer ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...Hydrogen is not easily available and we cant use this directly from water. It is ver...
^^^^
Line 7, column 139, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'it'?
Suggestion: the; it
...ogen based engine need platum metal and the it is very expensive metal.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 30.3222958057 46% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1038.0 1373.03311258 76% => OK
No of words: 195.0 270.72406181 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32307692308 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45476632534 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 145.348785872 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569230769231 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 326.7 419.366225166 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.4416346409 49.2860985944 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.5 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.25 21.698381199 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 7.06452816374 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.456240013407 0.272083759551 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168079403037 0.0996497079465 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.19169115499 0.0662205650399 289% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258077362904 0.162205337803 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.224629839159 0.0443174109184 507% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.