Scientists tell us that some activities are good for health and others are bad. Despite knowing that, millions of people still continue doing unhealthy activities. What are the causes and what are the solutions for this?
Although it is proven by experts that there are a variety of activities helping improve our health immensely, people have been underestimating them, instead, they choose to remain bad habits compromising themselves to some extent. The problems associated with this practice can be pronounced, they are not without feasible solutions.
There are two explanations triggering this trend. Firstly, once people are addicted to unhealthy habits, the chances are that they will find it is difficult to break them. For instance, smoking has been shown that it is one of the key culprit causing respiratory, however, people cannot reduce their dependence on cigarettes on an account of its addictiveness. Secondly, people are prone to undue optimistic since they haven’t suffered from any directly clear consequences yet. Truly, they keep their faith that everything is not as worse as the media want them to believe, although they can be aware of the results but they still convince themselves that notion.
Nevertheless, the problems above can be remedied, provided that some of the following preparatory steps are taken. The first measure is that government should imposing higher taxes on unhealthy products such as alcohol, cigarettes. In all likelihood, people do not want to spend much on such things which not only negatively affect on their health, but also need a huge amount of money. Furthermore, healthy lifestyles should invariably broadcast and be promoted; likewise unsound activities need to be strictly criticized on the media. Therefore, with a sense of self-protection, sooner or later, people will give up their old routines and take up new lifestyles impacting positively on their health.
In conclusion, the tendency had become a dilemma, and some holistic approaches should be adopted. Only when concerted endeavors are made by the government and individuals themselves can this thorny issue be resolved perfectly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-18 | Lai Nhu Phuong | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | Lai Nhu Phuong | 84 | view |
| 2018-10-27 | abosede | 73 | view |
| 2015-01-31 | mohd326 | 32 | view |
- The civic centre will be planned to change. There are two maps: one is the existing and the other is the plan for new. 61
- Studies show that criminals get low level of education. Some people believe that the best way to reduce the crime is educating people in prison so they can get a job after leaving prison. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- Some parents should spend time on reading or telling stories to children, while others thinks that children can read through a variety of sources such as books, TV and Internet by themselves. Discuss both view and give opinion. 78
- The government and individuals are spending too much money on national celebrations like new year or festivals. Do you agree or disagree? 78
- The chart below shows the process of waste paper recycling. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 65, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ms above can be remedied, provided that some of the following preparatory steps are taken. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 326, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...n such things which not only negatively affect on their health, but also need a huge amou...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, likewise, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1652.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48837209302 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99015872752 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637873754153 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7917148067 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9285714286 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132283159394 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0422104936801 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0251648590686 0.0667982634062 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0751637300752 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0236514121896 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.