Summaries the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made reading passage. The cane toads population
The reading and lecture are both about the cane toad population, which nowadays threatens native small animals. The author of reading believes that there are some methods, which can stop the spread of the cane toad. The lecture challenges the statement made by the author. The professor is of the opinion that these ways are impractical.
First of all, the author suggests that it can build a national fence to prevent from reaching the toads. This idea is challenged by the lecture. She says that young toads and their eggs are located in the rivers, so they can pass easily by waters ways. Consequently, the young toads can colonize in a new place; therefore, building the fence is not a useful way for them.
Secondly, the writer contends that the toads could be caught by hand, especially the young toads and the eggs. The lecture, however, rebuts this by asserting that this work can be dangerous for native frogs. She elaborates on this by mentioning that unskilled volunteers can hurt the frogs and this is very bad because some of them are endangered
Finally, it is stated that in the article that can use the specific virus to regulation the cane toad populations. The author establishes that the virus can destroy the cane toads and it has no danger for other animals. The lecture, on the other hand, posits that this is the bad think because it has harmful results for toads and original home. She mentions that in Australia can transfer the reptile to other sites to prevent infections, but in America if the virus attacks the native cane toads, it will destroy their populations. As a result, this event can change the entire ecosystem because the toads are a significant part of the ecosystem in America.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-21 | NIMA SAEEDI | 83 | view |
- If you could change one important thing about your hometown, what would you change? Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer 70
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific methods proposed in the reading passage.frog's population which have declined in recent years 80
- What is salvage logging? 3
- There is some theories about the agnostides which had been extincted 450millions years ago. 81
- what is the source of the sound? 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 217, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...h can stop the spread of the cane toad. The lecture challenges the statement made b...
^^^
Line 1, column 274, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...enges the statement made by the author. The professor is of the opinion that these ...
^^^
Line 5, column 347, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... bad because some of them are endangered Finally, it is stated that in the articl...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1431.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 298.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80201342282 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46865170698 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503355704698 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 441.9 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.303964942 49.2860985944 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8666666667 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06452816374 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144174614507 0.272083759551 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560362045095 0.0996497079465 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0335836489701 0.0662205650399 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0926488244982 0.162205337803 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329265124586 0.0443174109184 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.