The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph gives information about the proportion of tourists who visited four different attractions of Brighton in England between 1980 and 2010.
Overall, it is clear that the proportion of tourists who visited pavilion and pier increased with some fluctuations while the visitors of art gallery and festival declined throughout the period.
As the graph shows, the percentage of pavilion visitors started at around 24% in 1990 followed by a significant rise to just below 50% in 1995. This figure then plunged to around 35% in 2000 before declining gradually to a near of 30% in 2010. Similarly, about 10% of the tourists visited the pier of Brighton in 1980 which then rose slightly at around 15% in 1985. However, this figure fell steadily to below 10% after 5 years but experienced considerable growth to a high of around 22% in 2010.
On the other hand, the percentage of tourists who went to see art galleries declined between the 20 year period. In 1980, around 22% of foreigners attended art museum which rose dramatically to around 38% until 1985. Since then, it fell significantly to 20% and continued to decrease from around 22% in 1995 to 8% in 2010. Regarding the festivals, 30% of tourists preferred festivals in 1980 which witnessed gradual decrease to approximately 25% in 1995. Afterward, this value rose to around 28% and remained constant.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-14 | Kien Vu | 11 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | Kien Vu | 11 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | Kien Vu | 11 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | Sagar Gurung | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-02 | Trần Thị Như Quỳnh | 84 | view |
- Some people think that government should give money to creative people such as artists and musicians.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- The table below gives information about UK independent films 74
- The table below gives information about a restaurant’s average sales in three different branches in 2016.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Education is not a luxury, but a basic human right and as such should be free for everyone irrespective of personal wealth. Do you agree or disagree? 61
- The diagram below shows how a central heating system in a house works 33
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, regarding, similarly, so, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 33.7804878049 189% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1145.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02192982456 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78503936966 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543859649123 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.7068181004 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.090909091 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7272727273 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72727272727 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160311222001 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0683556944461 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.098663938991 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141770467018 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125791207755 0.0819641961636 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.