The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010.
The bar chart compares the proportions of Australian males and females in terms of physically active on a regular basis in the year 2010.
Overall, five in the six age group had the number of material activity women more than men. Especially, the most obvious difference was in the 35 to 44 age.
In the youngest age category (15 to 24), where having the number of men bodily active higher than women about 5.1%. However, between the ages of 25 and 44, men were much less active on average than women. In fact, in the 35 to 44 age group, the number of males doing some form of exercise was the lowest at 39.5%, compared to 52% of females
Looking at the next two age class (45 to 64), the percentage of males physical activity rose to about 45,1%, while the figures for females still remained stable at 53%, taller than around 8%. Finally, the rates of people aged 65 and over in Australian who joining in physical activities was quite equal, at approximately 47%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | tranhien297 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | BIBHU KALITA | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | jason Lou | 11 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | jason Lou | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | Noah1997 | 78 | view |
- In the future it is expected that there will be a higher proportion of older people in some countries Is this positive or negative development 89
- The percentage of 3 types of crimes car theft house burglary street robbery in England Wales from 1970 to 2015 70
- In many cities there is little control on the design and construction of new houses so people can build houses in their own style rather than building them with the same style or the old houses in the local area Do advantages outweigh dissdvantages 89
- The bar chart shows the employment status of adults in the US in 2003 and 2013 78
- The bar chart shows the distribution of employment among agriculture services industries in three countries in 1980 and projected distribution in 2020 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, look, so, still, while, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 792.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.52571428571 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3563098095 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611428571429 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.5325151115 43.030603864 189% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.142857143 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 5.23603664747 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356011443163 0.215688989381 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168626225922 0.103423049105 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626520153656 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217315945154 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0491556628555 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.29 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.