Students can obtain information about the academic subject from online, the printed books and articles, and discussion with their teachers and their peers. Which one is the most reliable source?
In this world, the methods of receiving informational resources have become changed. Although invent of the internet proof notable for many reasons in the academic sector despite that the value of traditional approaches such as discuss with teachers and experienced seniors has their own integral. This essay will discuss how a conversation with educators is effective for scholars as compared with online approaches.
Admittedly, today's era, achieving academic material from online websites are the most convenient way to solve any type of study-related matters. To specify, through online one can get easy access not only the information but also print the information as well. For example, in Punjab Private Schools Council offer smart classes facility to the students, by dint of that way they can learn how to use online educational websites. As a result, it is an accessible measure for the students to get information through websites with in the seconds.
On the contrary, in many cases, the problem related to academics can not be tackled by using online methods. Firstly, subjects like mathematics and science solely understood under the direction of the teacher. Secondly, there is no doubt a variety of information on the internet can be inaccurate for the scholars so, the teacher can direct to the student what academic data is good or bad for their learning. Let alone the other benefits of consulting with experienced peers that they can offer the right study material to the students so, that will be profitable for them.
In conclusion, although online measures brings a rich variety of benefits in the learning process, however, discussing concerns with the educators is one of the efficient ways to lessen any kind of problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-24 | rim toor | 85 | view |
| 2019-06-22 | Gohar Khan | 70 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, in conclusion, kind of, no doubt, such as, as a result, in many cases, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1471.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 282.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21631205674 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80981773438 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58865248227 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.65517241379 219% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4447353102 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.583333333 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.9166666667 7.25397266985 192% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25056493177 0.242375264174 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0885638293847 0.0925447433944 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0459258185316 0.071462118173 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140207523209 0.151781067708 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0433001371647 0.0609392437508 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 12.6369458128 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 55.0591133005 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.