The use of the mobile phones has increased dramatically in the recent years.
What are the positive and negative effects of this trend?
Nowadays, there is excessively increased number of mobile phone users in the world. As nothing is perfect, this has its own both positive and negative consequences. Accordingly, the current essay will accentuate both type of results of dramatic increase in users of portable devices.
On the one hand, smartphones are causing many detrimental outcomes, such as loss of social skills and damage to people's health. The scientists have revealed that the radiation created on a certain level has negative effect on a person's health. Consequently, this may potentially lead to serious diseases like cancer and tumor. Moreover, the social problems resulting from mobile phones also exist. Today's youth is so much engaged in portable gadgets, that they are losing face-to-face communication skills. The obvious example is preference of chatting with friend online instead of going out with them. In long term, this will result in loss of linguistic speaking skills.
On the other hand, such technological devices have an indispensable role in our life, as they bring several various benefits to humans. First of all, they enable opportunity of easy connection among people throughout the world. For instance, I can easily call my close friend in spare time, even though he is in another part of the world. So, mobile phones have become the most convenient tool of communication for everybody. Another valuable effect of modern technology in portable phones is more easily accessible entertainment for users. Access to the web, listening to high-resolution music and taking beautiful photos are some examples of entertainment offered by today's smartphones. As a result, the utilization of them is considered to be advantageous.
In conclusion, the significant increase in using mobile phones has both advantages and drawbacks. It depends on users whether to implement them properly.
- The bar graph below shows the amount of carbon emissions in different countries during three different years.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Central and local goverments make a frantic atempt to promote festivals to create a lof revenue. Some people think this money should be invested in social programmes for the poor.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 56
- Traditions in two different families 56
- The bar chart below shows the number of employees from the European Union in the United States 1999 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 74
- The use of the mobile phones has increased dramatically in the recent years.What are the positive and negative effects of this trend? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 113, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'people'.
Suggestion: people
... as loss of social skills and damage to peoples health. The scientists have revealed th...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 229, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
... certain level has negative effect on a persons health. Consequently, this may potentia...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, consequently, first, if, may, moreover, so, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1603.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47098976109 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00718425962 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634812286689 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.1232982406 49.4020404114 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.3684210526 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4210526316 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.63157894737 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211061331127 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589729495665 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0690867894691 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139928893352 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.068057037385 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.15 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.