Some people prefer to have one Model person, while others like to have more than one Models. Discuss both sides and give your opinion
In modern times, the issue of following one model or more has become increasingly controversial. While it can be argued that some people prefer getting one model in their beliefs, another opinion is that having a lot of models in life make them better and people feel more convenient and pleasurable. In this essay I will examine both sides of argument and provide my overall opinion.
In one hand, those people who think that only one model should be followed have their own perspective and reasons. Perhaps one of the main reasons is because those nations believe that they may not be sporadic which means they can fit in just one life of a person. For example, numerous researches prove that there is no confused when people go after only one human. So that’s why some people think that one model person must be followed in anything.
On the other hand, there are vast majority of people believe that it is important to make in model characters in the life which is why they can earn affluence of values from many characters. In addition, the verity in models which means choosing more than one to make our life is variable in an enormous ideas and in opinions. Hence, the belief that diversity in model persons lead to open up.
In conclusion, having one model or more are topics which raises strong passions on both sides of argument. Having considered both sides of the issue, I would argue that imitating large in number in models because they lead to open-mind and sooner or later you would be one of those models.
- People prefer that children enter one pigeon in front of the TV, while some prefer to sit for a long time. Discuss both sides and give your opnion 56
- People prefer that children enter one pigeon in front of the TV, while some prefer to sit for a long time. Discuss both sides and give your opnion 56
- Some people prefer to have one Model, while others like to have more than one Models. Discuss both sides and give your opinion 56
- Some people prefer to have one Model, while others like to have more than one Models. Discuss both sides and give your opinion 61
- Some people prefer children to sit for one hour in front of the TV, while others prefer to sit for a long time. Discuss both sides and give your opinion 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 35, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'majorities'?
Suggestion: majorities
...ng. On the other hand, there are vast majority of people believe that it is important ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 180, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: large
...the issue, I would argue that imitating large in number in models because they lead to open-min...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 291, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...later you would be one of those models.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, may, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1273.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71481481481 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3925610593 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544444444444 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5248173141 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.083333333 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.08333333333 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.442017277639 0.244688304435 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16577160814 0.084324248473 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0816212976449 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.273493200412 0.151304729494 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0758834541289 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.