The diagrams below show UK students' responses to the question of to what extent would they describe themselves as financially organised.
The diagram provided illustrate how the United Kingdom’s student replies to the inquiries regarding the way they distinguish themselves as financially organised.
At first glance, it is evident that commonly the students consider themselves as moderately organised, and generally, the student over 25 years manage their finances more effectively.
To begin with, the proportions of not very organised students and moderately organised students share an almost similar number, approximately 20% each. However, there are striking differences in the groups of well-organised and disorganised students. While the former accounted for more than half of the proportion, the letter is a minor figure.
Moving to the table, from a total of 21 financially well-organised students, just below a fourth is age below 22 years old, following by the student aged 23-25 years old at around 26% and those who are over 25 years with the figure almost twice that of the age group below 22.
- The chart shows unemployment rate and the number of people leaving Ireland from 1988 to 2008. 56
- Research shows that business meetings, discussions and training are happening online nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. 84
- The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt within in the three countries .Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six area of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where is relevant. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, regarding, so, well, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 839.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48366013072 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08856553202 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.673202614379 0.547539520022 123% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.9526227674 43.030603864 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.833333333 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1666666667 5.23603664747 194% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179201763358 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0820133726131 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0773528030333 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118198562344 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.067956744026 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.2329268293 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 61.2550243902 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.