The diagrams below show UK students' responses to the question of to what extent would they describe themselves as financially organised.
<span style="font-size: 19.36px;">The diagrams provided illustrate how the United Kingdom’s student replies on the inquiries regarding the way they distinguish themselves as financially organised.
At first glance, it is evident that commonly the students consider themselves as moderately organised, and generally, the student over 26 years manage their finances more effectively.
According to the first chart, the most significant student’s response is fairly organised, more than a half of total, while both well-organised and not very organised answers shares similar figure (around 20% each). In contrast, just 4% of the students feel that they are disorganised.
The second chart shows that there is a significant difference in the age group. Out of total 21 students considering themselves as a financially very-organised, the majority is aged over 26 years old (35%,) following by the aged 23-25 years old group at just above a fourth and the remaining proportion is those aged up to 22 years old.</span><br>
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in two years. 56
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other type of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- The world has seen an enormous increase in flights for leisure, business, and commercial purposes around the world over recent years. What do you think are the main advantages and disadvantages of such flights?Do you think flights should be taxed more? 61
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995 - 2002.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, second, so, well, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 885.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70967741935 4.92477711251 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.6801008899 2.65546596893 139% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.677419354839 0.547539520022 124% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.637035243 43.030603864 169% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.5 112.824112599 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8333333333 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 5.23603664747 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202021088775 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0996712154583 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0363310836985 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120277071557 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0266454230851 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.2329268293 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 61.2550243902 61% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 11.4140731707 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.