Some people believe that a college or university education should be available to all students.
Others believe that higher education should be available only to good students. Discuss these
views. Which view do you agree with? Explain why.
Some people believe that college education should be available to all students without any evaluations for the applicant's abilities. Others hold that university admission must only be allowed for hard-working learners. In my opinion, I concur with the perspective that degrees after high school must solely be offered for promising students. I feel this way for many potential reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, the majority of individuals would agree with the notion that letting inept students to join universities without investigation of their capabilities through admission tests, and without looking into their previous grades could be disastrous in the long run. To illustrate more thoroughly, permitting students with low grades and poor performance to attend university could have a detrimental effect on the community. My own experience is a compelling example on what I mean. When I was in medical school, our local government started granting licenses for new colleges and universities with no prior inspection for the procedures that happened in these novel institutions. We realized later that these schools do not mind accepting applicants with extremely low GPA. Moreover, when I got to meet a friend from these newly established universities who was studying the same courses that I was taking in my school, I was curious to figure out how things work there. Thus, I asked him about the chapters that were assigned to them in a specific class. Surprisingly, I found out that his curriculum was half of mine. Furthermore, when we ran into each other after graduation, we talked about certain issues in our careers but I was shocked since he was unaware of many principles in the healthcare field to the extent that poses danger to patients and society as a whole. Therefore, I became convinced that schools should put eligibility measures for students and should not accept every student.
On top of that, since the number of spots in universities around the country is limited, it's more convenient and more fair to give priority to outstanding students. For instance, most colleges get several thousands of applications more than their capacity to enroll students and they have to decide which applications to approve and which ones to reject. As a result, most organizations opt for comparing the submitted documents and giving precedence for more qualified students. This process also ensures justice owing to the fact that students under this policy would not feel discriminated against.
To sum up, I firmly believe that attending university should be merit-based for the reasons and details discussed above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-29 | bishoy | 90 | view |
| 2019-01-01 | navid.pa92 | 76 | view |
- Like many creatures, humpback whales migrate long distances for feeding and mating purposes. How animals manage to migrate long distances is often puzzling. In the case of humpback whales, we may have found the answer: they may be navigating by the stars, 78
- reading passage.题目原文：In 1938 an archaeologist in Iraq acquired a set of clay jars that had been excavated two years earlier by villagers constructing a railroad line. The vessel was about 2,200 years old. Each clay jay contained a copper cylinde 3
- Professors are normally found in university classrooms, offices, and libraries doingresearch and lecturing to their students. More and more, however, they also appearas guests on television news programs, giving expert commentary on the latestevents in th 73
- Archaeologists have recently found a fossil of a 150-million-year-old mammalknown as Repenornamus robustus (R. robustus). Interestingly, the mammal'sstomach contained the remains of a psittacosaur dinosaur. Some researchers havetherefore suggested th 73
- Archaeologists have recently found a fossil of a 150-million-year-old mam-mal known as Repenomomus robustus (R. robustus). Interestingly, the mammal's stomach contained the remains of a psittacosaur dinosaur. Some researchers have therefore suggested 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 150, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e applicants abilities. Others hold that university admission must only be allowe...
^^
Line 13, column 122, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he reasons and details discussed above.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for instance, i feel, i mean, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.0286738351 190% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2256.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 427.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28337236534 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91269562017 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594847775176 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 696.6 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.7306637007 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.736842105 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4736842105 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57894736842 5.45110844103 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219456628764 0.236089414692 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0653901767514 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0865474463965 0.0737576698707 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157691454695 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0892240130189 0.0645574589148 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 86.8835125448 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.