TPO 50
The reading passage states some problems associated with sending humans to Mars which is far more challenging than missions to the Moon since it is 150 times further. The lecturer, however, informs some solutions that have been suggested by scientists, despitte confirming that it would be a challenging missioin.
First, reading argues that transfering an adequate food, oxygen, and watter supply a two years trip seems to be imfeasibleowing to the capacity of space ships. On the contrary, the professor highlights the fact that there is a technic by which plants’ roots can be cultivated in water instead of soil wich is very space saving; thereby, the crew are able to have crops as food. Furtheremore, she states that they can use waste water and recycle it, so that they can have fresh water. In addition, plants absorb carbon dioxide and produce O2. All of the above-mentioned technics can sole the supply problem.
Next, the passage mentions that zero gravity of the area in which passengers are gaing to stay has very harmful effects on them such as decreasing the boddy mass of bone’s density. The speaker proposes that having experienced same situation in several missions, the crew are familiar with methods that these problems can be controlled. She also mentions regular exercise and menerals such as calsium as instances of these technics.
Finally, the passage brings up the problem of being exposed to a lot of gangrous radiations most of which are emitted by the sun and not having a protective shield due to its high weight. Lecturer discribes that not all the time the sun emits sush harmful radiations. Therefore, a device can be installed in the spaceship to monitor the amount of radiations. and also a light weight small shield should be stablished. These two device will allow them to do ordinary tasks at the time of normal radiation and stay safe while radiations are dangrous.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-14 | sonyeoso | 90 | view |
| 2022-12-14 | Iman karim | 57 | view |
| 2022-10-22 | porteghale Abiasli | view | |
| 2022-09-01 | Allenwlh | 70 | view |
| 2022-08-04 | TommyTan | 80 | view |
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement?governments should spent more money in support of the arts than support of athletics such as state-sponsored olympic teams 78
- TPO 48 90
- TPO 50 3
- TPO 54 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better for the younger people to take risk and explore new things than the older people. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 548, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: All the
...s absorb carbon dioxide and produce O2. All of the above-mentioned technics can sole the s...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 360, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...ip to monitor the amount of radiations. and also a light weight small shield should...
^^^
Line 7, column 371, Rule ID: LIGHT_WEIGHT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lightweight'?
Suggestion: lightweight
...or the amount of radiations. and also a light weight small shield should be stablished. Thes...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, so, therefore, while, in addition, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 319.0 270.72406181 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03134796238 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7348829073 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 145.348785872 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598746081505 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 419.366225166 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6226124266 49.2860985944 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2666666667 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06452816374 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 63.6247240618 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.