Independent Writing Task Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to support you
Nowadays, the internet holds infinite information and it keeps adding more into its database every single second; likewise, we have access to it, but how veridical is this information? According to this, I partially agree with the statement and I will explain the reasons of it in the following essay.
To begin with, the information on internet spreads widely and faster than any other media, those that involve a whole process of compilation of information and resources to finally be put on the public spotlight. Hence, today's latest news are found more rapidly online than on television or newspapers. For instance, Tweeter which is a platform of microblogging that not only receives but also sends a vast information across the world by its users; thereby, there is the possibility to ask for donations of medicine for people who are in need and they have no way to afford such treatments. Indeed, it is thanks to internet that the information can go to a massive amount of people in less time.
On the other hand, many pages on internet cause misinformation due the lack of knowledge and effort of the owners use to prove the veracity of the information and even if they claim to be rightful there is no easier way to prove rightfulness of it. In contrast, the analog sources of information such as magazines, newspapers and books must be certified and veridical before publishing. As an illustration of this, we can take the case of research resources for thesis, in which having sources that support each information are needed to prove that the research is based on real facts and an expert can sustain them. Moreover, as it is mention before books are the most common case to quotation beyond college students; since, it has a compilation of information verified by an expert in that field, while internet pages are put aside due to the uncertainty of the person who is behind the publication.
For these reasons, I would like to conclude that the value of the information we can find on internet it could be a plethora of boons depending on how we decide to use it and how valid the resource can be.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 221, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'nowadays the latest'.
Suggestion: nowadays the latest
... be put on the public spotlight. Hence, nowadays latest news are found more rapidly online than...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 115, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...k of knowledge and effort of the owners use to prove the veracity of the informatio...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, hence, if, likewise, moreover, second, so, while, for instance, in contrast, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1764.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 367.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80653950954 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7939879645 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534059945504 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6003584229 53% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.1344086022 164% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.2401641091 48.9658058833 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.363636364 100.406767564 160% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.3636363636 20.6045352989 162% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5454545455 5.45110844103 230% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152389366181 0.236089414692 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060182653822 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0359764810183 0.0737576698707 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0920147855672 0.150856017488 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351320858337 0.0645574589148 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 11.7677419355 152% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 58.1214874552 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.1575268817 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.21 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.0537634409 151% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.