In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people has a wider range of knowledge, expertise, and skills than any single individual is likely to possess. Also, because of the numbers of people involved and the greater resources they possess, a group can work more quickly in response to the task assigned to it and can come up with highly creative solutions to problems and issues. Sometimes these creative solutions come about because a group is more likely to make risky decisions that an individual might not undertake. This is because the group spreads responsibility for a decision to all the members and thus no single individual can be held accountable if the decision turns out to be wrong.
Taking part in a group process can be very rewarding for members of the team. Team members who have a voice in making the decision will no doubt feel better about carrying out the work out the work that is entailed by that decision than they might doing work that is imposed on them by others. Also, the individual team member has a much better chance to “shine,” to get his or her contributions and ideas not only recognized but recognized as highly significant, because a team’s overall results can be more far-reaching and have greater impact than what might have otherwise been possible for the person to accomplish or contribute working alone.
This article states that the best way to approach a new project is to make a team and provides three reasons of support. However , the professor explains that one company failed to work as a team and refutes each of the author's reasons .
First, the reading claims that in a group the people have a wider range of knowledge and experience . The professor refutes this point. He states that some of the employee works hard for the project and other get a free ride . They didn't give much. The recognition gone to the group and the people who worked hard are side lined.
Second, the article posits that creative solutions come from a group. However, the professor says that it took many days for the group person to come up with a decision how to move with the project. According to him, more influential individual try to establish their idea. Sometime some great ideas are dropped due to this personal influential .
Third, the reading says that individual team member has a much better chance to shine in a group. The professor opposes this point by explaining that here the individual’s performance is not evaluated rather the group is punished for its failure. He states that due to this when the project failed the full responsibility falls upon the group , not any individual member.
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 50
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 50
- a mandatory policy, requiring companies to offer their employees the option of working four-day workweek for 80% of the regular pay would benefit the economy as well as individual companies. Also, the employees who decided to take this option will benefit 80
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 50
- It has recently been announced that a new movie theater may be built in your neighborhood. Do you support or oppose this plan? Why? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 129, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ovides three reasons of support. However , the professor explains that one company...
^^
Line 1, column 236, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... and refutes each of the authors reasons . First, the reading claims that in ...
^^
Line 5, column 100, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... wider range of knowledge and experience . The professor refutes this point. He st...
^^
Line 5, column 152, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ssor refutes this point. He states that some of the employee works hard for the project and...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 225, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...or the project and other get a free ride . They didnt give much. The recognition g...
^^
Line 5, column 233, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...roject and other get a free ride . They didnt give much. The recognition gone to the ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 345, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...dropped due to this personal influential . Third, the reading says that indiv...
^^
Line 13, column 348, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...full responsibility falls upon the group , not any individual member.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1084.0 1373.03311258 79% => OK
No of words: 223.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86098654709 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59545921473 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578475336323 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 326.7 419.366225166 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.2773269384 49.2860985944 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.4285714286 110.228320801 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9285714286 21.698381199 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.35714285714 7.06452816374 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259341350664 0.272083759551 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0820417381559 0.0996497079465 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0847020765064 0.0662205650399 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14949322105 0.162205337803 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.055854967089 0.0443174109184 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.3589403974 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 63.6247240618 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.