Violence in playgrounds is increasing. However, it is important that parents should teach children not to hit back at bullies.
Discuss this view and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for you answer and include any relevant examples from you own knowledge or experience.
Regardless of whether or not parents should teach their children to response to bullying is an increasingly debating viewpoint. There are valid opinions on both sides which I will examine carefully before my owner opinion given.
On the one hand, teaching children not to react the harassment violently would consist of positively effect in the long run. In fact, children who are brought up in a violent way often become violent themselves. Moreover, some of them maybe have a tendency to be aggressive and develop into bullies. In contrast, families should inspire their children to look for other ways of resolving disagreements and knowing how to deal with their conflicts through open discussions rather than by force. As a result, this orientation will create a non-violence behavior when they grow up and help them to maintain their relationships in the good way with others.
In some cases, the counteroffensive from children in response to violence and harassment might bring some advantages. when hitting back at bullies, they can threaten bullies not to attack them again, which might reduce serious physical injuries during the fight. Definitely, by making bullies be cautious of whom have threatened them and looking for the assistance from elderly people in surrounding areas, children are likely to have more chance to end the fight quickly and keep them safe. Thus, victims will have an opportunity to not be bullied anymore.
Although there are still arguments on whether children should be instructed to response to bullying at school. It is my belief that teaching non-violent strategies is more productive and having better permanent effect.
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s 78
- The map below shows how changes were made to the floor of a house after 2 years 11
- The chart below shows information about students studying in six major subjects at the US university in 2010. 78
- The graph below shows consumers' average annual expenditure on cell phone, national andinternational fixed-line and services in America between 2001 and 2010. The graph below shows consumers' average annual expenditure on cell phone, national andinternati 84
- Violence in playgrounds is increasing However it is important that parents should teach children not to hit back at bullies Discuss this view and give your own opinion Give reasons for you answer and include any relevant examples from you own knowledge or 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 15, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
Regardless of whether or not parents should teach their children to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 163, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a violent way" with adverb for "violent"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...n. In fact, children who are brought up in a violent way often become violent themselves. Moreov...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 119, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...harassment might bring some advantages. when hitting back at bullies, they can threa...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, may, moreover, so, still, thus, in contrast, in fact, as a result, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1411.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3045112782 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81782654162 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631578947368 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3741122038 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.538461538 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4615384615 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61538461538 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146474798398 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0512831377631 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0281916791334 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0904051340454 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0117369041386 0.056905535591 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.