Organize tour to remote areas and community is increasingly popular. It is a positive or negative development for the local and the environment?
In recent years, with the rapid development of tourism industry, travelling to remote regions has been increasingly becoming common. While this trend brings the local many huge advantages, I believe there are still other negative impacts on the locality and the environment.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why this is a positive development. Firstly, more jobs are created for local residents when there are many travelers reaching isolated areas. For instance, in order to cater for tourists, local habitants can do a variety of services such as making souvenir, selling special regional food or renting accommodation. This would in turn help them to have a decent income and take care well of their family. In addition, they would also have the opportunities to meet new people from different background, which may help them to increase the chance of socializing and enhance their knowledge.
On the other hand, those types of travelling can cause some negative effects on community as well as the environment, which the local authority should take into account. First, since there are more people flocking and living in these small areas, the surrounding atmosphere will be seriously polluted if it is not strictly supervised by authorities. Furthermore, in order to attract more visitors, some people exploit their nature surroundings by building resorts, hostels, restaurants, etc. As a result, the nature beauty of those landscapes would gradually disappear and local species also lose their habitat. Regarding the social effects, the appearance of many strange people may lead to social evils such as prostitution or spreading epidemic and even illegal trafficking.
In conclusion, the increase in open tours to farther areas is an inevitable trend and I believe this tendency has both bright side and dark side for the local and environment.
- Although more and more people read the news on the internet, newspaper will remain the main source of news for the majority of people. Do you agree or disagree with the statement? 78
- Some people think that children should begin their formal education at a very early age. Some think they should begin at least 7 years old. Discuss both views give opinions ? 73
- More and more people buy a wide range of household goods such as television microwave oven and rice cooker Do you think this is a positive or negative development 84
- Some people think that advertising aimed at children should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some people think that children should begin their formal education at a very early age Some think they should begin at least 7 years old Discuss both views give opinions 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 492, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ding resorts, hostels, restaurants, etc. As a result, the nature beauty of those ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, regarding, so, still, well, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1585.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35472972973 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83925318631 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618243243243 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3432034222 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.923076923 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7692307692 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.2307692308 7.06120827912 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210103192738 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063458900821 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557997404653 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131856886114 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050235913489 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.