Some people think that advertising aimed at children should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some individuals argue that government should prohibit advertisement that targets at children. I partly agree with this view because of the following reasons.
On the one hand, I believe there should be some control over advertising campaigns for children. Firstly, advertising can make children involve in a materialistic lifestyle. Indeed, some surveys have reported that if children are frequently exposed to repeated commercial breaks on TV, they are more likely to keep pestering their parents for buying things that they want. This may also lead to a financial burden put on their parents shoulders. Additionally, advert contents are not always credited, which may cause a serious misleading on children. For instance, television commercials about fast food or Coke may make children think that kinds of foods are beneficial for their health. As a result, they are more likely to consume junk food and become obesity.
On the other hand, I would argue that advertising for children is still necessary. From the commercial perspective, publicizing products on media channels is an effective marketing strategy which helps business have more customers and generate huge profits. Therefore, it seems unreasonable that if a company is not permitted to introduce their innovative products to their potential consumers. Moreover, adults should also be informed about various types of products for youngster, which in turn helps them have the best choice for their children. For example, parents should know which category of dairy is appropriate for their children when they decide to purchase this kind of product.
In conclusion, there are both merits and demerits when advertising agencies consider children as their target audience and authorities should have some measure to limit these kinds of adverts.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | sepide1367 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | Niusha | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | lydunhien | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | longpm2k | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | torontoontario | 84 | view |
- More and more people buy a wide range of household goods such as television microwave oven and rice cooker Do you think this is a positive or negative development 84
- Genetic engineering is an important issue in society today. Some people think that it will improve people’s lives in many ways. Others feel that it may be a threat to life on earth. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 78
- Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end world poverty and hunger. Others say that economic growth is damaging the environment and should stop. Discuss both view and give your own opinion. 84
- Organize tour to remote areas and community is increasingly popular. It is a positive or negative development for the local and the environment? 89
- Genetic engineering is an important issue in society today Some people think that it will improve people s lives in many ways Others feel that it may be a threat to life on earth Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 682, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hen they decide to purchase this kind of product. In conclusion, there are b...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1548.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52857142857 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82045869406 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592857142857 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8601818915 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.2 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187721003815 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0751229713154 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738236504549 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140490141068 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0491430802562 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.