Today, TV channels provide men’s sport shows more than women’s sports shows. Why? Should TV channels give equal time for women’s sport and men’s sport?
It is true that there are fewer females’ sports shows than males’ sports programs shown on television. There are some reasons why this is the case and it is not necessarily that Television channels need to give equal time for both of these programs.
There are several reasons why fewer sports shows for women are produced compared to those of men. The foremost reason is that in practical, there is a wide range of sport activities for men taken place, which the television stations could film and present it on screens. For example, in Viet Nam, males’ football matches are held on a monthly basis in metropolises like Ho Chi Minh city. In fact, on account of their innate characteristics, men can participate on a variety of competition ranging from average sports such as swimming, football, tennis to extreme sports like sky_diving or bungee jumping. In addition, if men’s sport shows are broadcast on television, there will be a huge number of viewers watching them including females. This can be explained by the fact that in those games men players perform so brilliantly that they can appeal anyone regardless of his or her gender.
In my view, it is not necessary to increase much more time for women’s sport shows on TV channels. Instead, they should focus on other females’ programs such as fashion, cooking or family, which could make women become their loyal audience. Because of the gender difference, females pay more interests on these hobbies than sports, it does not means that the high number of females’ sport shows can meet their demand for entertaining. Indeed, there is a saying that quality is better than quantity. Other than that, men’s sport programs at the same attract women especially when male players appear in tournaments as heroes. Therefore, it seems to me that men’s sport shows could also cater for both male and female audiences.
In conclusion, there are some causes why men’s sport shows dominate on TV programs. Nevertheless, Television stations should not necessarily increase women’s sport shows.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-18 | kieutrangkg1 | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-27 | ngoc071003 | 61 | view |
| 2021-09-03 | Nguyễn Minhh Thư | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-03 | Nguyễn Minhh Thư | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-02 | Ngoctranthifoe07@ | 78 | view |
- Some people think that advertising aimed at children should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some people think that advertising aimed at children should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- People cart eat a wide variety of food that can be grown in other areas. As a result, people eat more food produced in other regions than local food. Do you think the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages? 84
- Although more and more people read the news on the internet, newspaper will remain the main source of news for the majority of people. Do you agree or disagree with the statement? 61
- New parents should attend parenting courses to ensure the growth of their children. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 27, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun females is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
It is true that there are less females’ sports shows than males’ sport...
^^^^
Line 3, column 576, Rule ID: SKY_DIVING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'skydiving'?
Suggestion: skydiving
...football, tennis to extreme sports like sky diving or bungee jumping. In addition, if men’...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 345, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'mean'
Suggestion: mean
... these hobbies than sports, it does not means that the high number of females’ sport ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in my view, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1732.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07917888563 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66645524513 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554252199413 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2301484431 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.25 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3125 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.548408679449 0.244688304435 224% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.187597398097 0.084324248473 222% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11495657339 0.0667982634062 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.361733004091 0.151304729494 239% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428330979606 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.