Children nowadays spend a great deal of time watching television.However, television cannot replace the book as a learning tool, which is why children are less well-educated today. To what extent do you agree with this statement?
Television revoultionized modern entertainment culture as maximum number of children remain indoor spending time in front of television set, which ultimately affected learning capabilities of children and resulted in depletion of education quality. I completely agree with this situation and would put forwards my views to support it.
With invention of television, modern lifestyle underwent transformation leading to maximum time spent indoor watching television. Firstly, television provide wide array of programmes’ for all age groups. Children are easily influenced and swayed by the content of television and are addicted to it. Moreover, many shows on television not meant for children are viewed by them in absence of parental supervision and wrong message is delivered to children. Secondly, educational content of television does not impart deep knowledge and proficient skills in single view. Though it seems enjoyable and fun to learn from TV sets, it is difficult to sustain, retain and gain knowledge in long term. For instance, Doordarshan National channel in India broadcast-ed many educational shows but it didn’t really enhanced student life due to irregularities and one time broadcast.
Many a times, children are influenced by violence and vulgarity which mostly have commercial and entertainment purpose. Children easily fall prey to such nuisance and imitates such actions in real life which hampers physical, social and mental development. This not only deflects them from formal education but also from normal behavior in daily life. For example many superhero pictures doesn’t convey any fruitful message but rather affects children making them believe it to be true.
Lastly, no means of electronic media can substitute books for learning. Books give a complete sense of acquiring knowledge and wisdom. Books can be read anywhere and anytime without any special requirement. Time spent in reading books is more productive than time spent in front of TV sets. Moreover, books help in overall cognitive development.
To conclude,I firmly adhere with the traditional methodology of learning and firmly believes that Television is simply a waste of time.
- In a cashless society people use more credit cards what are the advantages and advantages 84
- Some people think that foreign visitors should be charged more than locals when they visit cultural and tourist attractions in a country To what extent do you agree with this view 74
- Children nowadays spend a great deal of time watching television.However, television cannot replace the book as a learning tool, which is why children are less well-educated today. To what extent do you agree with this statement? 89
- In nearly all science courses at university there are significantly more male students than female students What is the reason for this What could be done to balance out the numbers 79
- Scientists have been warning for many years about importance of protecting the environment and that we mustlimit the use of energy in our daily lives. Despite warnings many people do not do this. What are the reasons andhow people can be encouraged to tak 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 189, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n provide wide array of programmes' for all age groups. Children are easily ...
^^
Line 9, column 6, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a time' or simply 'times'?
Suggestion: a time; times
...ities and one time broadcast. Many a times, children are influenced by violence an...
^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 12, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , I
... cognitive development. To conclude,I firmly adhere with the traditional meth...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, lastly, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1885.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69486404834 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01682167568 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61329305136 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.8014503393 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2105263158 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4210526316 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47368421053 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263260992955 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715160304359 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485033935238 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141958433652 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0582651803812 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.