Many people believe that teachers should take responsibilities for their students to judge what is right or wrong and behave well, while other feel that teachers should only teach academic subjects. Discuss both view and give your own opinion.
People have different views about the responsibility of teachers for student’s behaviours. While some individuals opine teachers should merely focus on academic subjects, I have a conviction that they should concern both the academic performances and conduct of their students.
On the one hand, there are some reasons why teachers should only shoulder responsibility for academic subjects. Firstly, parents play a more important role in nurturing their kids’ personality. As they can understand their offspring well; therefore, the children can be better educated to recognize moral values by their parents. Secondly, that teachers focusing on academic perspectives can also contribute to a good development of their students The first noticeable positive associated with academic and professional subjects is that they would help establish beneficial skills for the long-term development of learners. Math and science sharpen problem-solving skills, logical thinking and analytical capability whereas literature assists in communication and interpersonal skills, and all these prove essential qualities in our lives.
On the other hand, I side with those who believe that teachers also should be in charge of whether the students misbehave or not. Primarily, parents are more and more engaged with their work, so they have a tendency to pay little attention to their children’s conduct. In that case, instead of turning a blind to unacceptable behaviours of their students, the teachers can act as their parents’ role to rectify the misconduct of students so that they can be nurtured wholly in both cerebral and academic ability. For example, teachers can inform the student of moral principles, enforce the school’s code of conduct and motivate students to become ethical individuals.
In conclusion, it seems to me that teachers play a vital role in raising the academic performance and ethical misbehaviour of their students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-14 | lauranguyen_97 | 78 | view |
- The bar chart below gives information about the water use in China, USA, Russia and Australia in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 78
- News is playing a vital role in our life today and people are getting much influenced by the news now. Some say that news has no connection with most people's life and it is a waste of time for most of us to read newspaper and watch television news p 84
- The table shows the number of miles of passengers travelled on five types of transport in a European country in 1995 and 2005 It also shows a projection of the year 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compa 48
- Some people say that to solve today’s global program every nation should have a good relationship with other nations. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What do you think about cooperation and communication between countries? 84
- Development in technology causes environmental problems. Some people believe the solution in these problems is everyone accepts a simpler way of life, while others say that technology can solve these problems. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, whereas, while, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1679.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73037542662 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1724536278 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569965870307 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.1606645206 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.916666667 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4166666667 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9166666667 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299396060656 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123893006364 0.084324248473 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0865313086881 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201906910635 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0865872519627 0.056905535591 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.25 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.