Some people think studying in groups is better, while some think self-study is better for school students. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
A good education is the most valuable asset a person can have. One can become well-educated only through hard work and a lot of effort. It is a process that lasts for a person’s whole lifetime, which starts at an early age. A large part of it comes from the school period, so naturally, teachers and professors in schools question themselves what is the best and most efficient way their students can learn about a specific matter. Some people think studying in groups is better, while some think students should study individually. I think a good education comes with a mix of both of these things. However, I believe that group learning needs to be more encouraged.
Since the beginning of human civilization, our achievements and advancements have always come from a group effort. Rarely does one person achieve great things completely by himself. Even when famous scientists came to revolutionary conclusions in their field, they mostly relied on work done by less known experts who lived before them. Greatness simply brings too much load for an individual to carry, because it is in our nature to work together as a unit. Having this in mind, I think school programs should emphasize students learning and working together. It makes learning more efficient and fun because students interact and discuss with each other. Furthermore, teamwork in schools will prepare them for their future careers or jobs in which skills which are required for working as an organized group are a necessity.
Nevertheless, self-learning is important as well. Some skills are difficult to learn in a group and need to be exercised until one has obtained and understood them on a deeper level. It might be hard for mentors to distinguish if some student in their class has not learned the matter properly or completely, so I think students should still devote some of their time on self-learning and self-testing.
I think that both self-learning and group learning are essential parts of the educational system. However, more and more schools are dismissing rigorous individual learning and testing. Authorities are implementing more teamwork among young people, which is a very good thing in my opinion. Hopefully, that trend will continue in the future as well.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-20 | stefan ielts | 84 | view |
2020-01-20 | stefan ielts | 78 | view |
- Some people think that having people from different nationalities and cultural backgrounds living together in the same country makes the country develop faster. Do you agree? 84
- Some people think studying in groups is better, while some think self-study is better for school students. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
- Restrictions On Ownerships Of Mobile Phones 67
- Nowadays parents are sending their children on trips abroad for educational purposes. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this? 84
- In many countries today there are many highly qualified graduates without employment.What factors may have caused this situation and what, in your opinion, can/should be done about it? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s an organized group are a necessity. Nevertheless, self-learning is important...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, well, while, i think, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1902.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11290322581 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86610452546 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564516129032 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 570.6 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.9794393565 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5714285714 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7142857143 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.09523809524 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260122432549 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0732534296071 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123456548423 0.0667982634062 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157008015931 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0726139430211 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.