The bar graph shows the global sales (in billions of dollars) of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006.
The bar graph illustrates the global sales of mobile phones, online, console, and handheld games from 2000 to 2006.
Overall, the sales of online games, mobile phone games, and handheld games increased for the period. However, the sales of console games declined. Handheld games were the most popular class among all.
In 2000, the sales of the handheld game were slightly lower than $12 billion, which roused to around $18 billion in the last year. Online games came into the picture in 2001 with around $2 billion sales and ended up five times to $10 billion in 2006. A similar growth for mobile phone games is seen, which came in 2002 with around $2.5 billion equal to the sale of online games. However, it ended up at $7 billion that is $3 billion less than the online games.
Console games saw a decrease in sales with time. It started at around $6 billion in 2000 and ended up at $3 billion, which is the least in 2006.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | ieltsexam | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-26 | Lovepreet123 | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-10 | Nguyễn Quân | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | nguyenminhhanh | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-21 | wIsaac | 73 | view |
- The bar graph shows the global sales (in billions of dollars) of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006. 67
- The charts below show the total number of applicants the year before and the year after Doolittle University’s social media advertising campaign, organized by age range and how close the applicants live to the university. Summarize the information by s 67
- the chart below shows the highest educational degree earned by King City residents and the average household size in King City from 1950 - 2000 67
- Many people have difficulty maintaining a healthy diet.What are the causes of this problem? How could it be solved? 56
- Many people have difficulty maintaining a healthy diet.What are the causes of this problem? How could it be solved? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 182, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ame into the picture in 2001 with around billion sales and ended up five times to...
^^
Line 9, column 393, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of online games. However, it ended up at billion that is billion less than the o...
^^
Line 9, column 395, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
... online games. However, it ended up at billion that is billion less than the online g...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 410, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...However, it ended up at billion that is billion less than the online games. ...
^^
Line 9, column 412, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...wever, it ended up at billion that is billion less than the online games. Consol...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 70, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in sales with time. It started at around billion in 2000 and ended up at billion...
^^
Line 13, column 103, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... around billion in 2000 and ended up at billion, which is the least in 2006.
^^
Line 13, column 105, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...round billion in 2000 and ended up at billion, which is the least in 2006.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 756.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66666666667 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.03972886119 2.65546596893 77% => OK
Unique words: 78.0 106.607317073 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.481481481481 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.3257316482 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.6 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.1 5.23603664747 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308473300845 0.215688989381 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146299915812 0.103423049105 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0779657636424 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221819323457 0.15604864568 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0747700042932 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.2329268293 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.51 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.