tpo 45
the lecture and the article are both about Did bees, which kind of insects are lived before 200 million years. the professor suggests that these insects are created from bees. However, the passage disagrees with this idea for the following reasons.
First of all, the issue of present fossils of actual bees. The teacher says that it is really no remnant for actual bees because the tree trison, liquid materials are secreted by the tree. which the insect fossils are attaching on it, are appeared before 100 million years. This material might be not present before 200 million years. As a result, no fossils for the bees in this material. On the other hand, the reading disagrees with this idea.
Secondly, the trouble of the absent flowering plant before 200 million years. the professor asserts that although the flowers were absent in this duration, it is not mean the bees were not found Because it might these creatures were not unflowering feed. Also, after flowers appear, the bees are adapting to feeding on them.
Finally, the problem of lacking some details, The teacher says, however, the chambers are lacking from caps but that not mean the bees were not lived before 200 million years. He mentions that the chemical materials are found in the chamber is resemble the modern
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the lecture and the article are both about ...
^^^
Line 1, column 53, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and the article are both about Did bees, which kind of insects are lived before 2...
^^
Line 1, column 113, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...cts are lived before 200 million years. the professor suggests that these insects a...
^^^
Line 5, column 190, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Which
...uid materials are secreted by the tree. which the insect fossils are attaching on it,...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 79, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...owering plant before 200 million years. the professor asserts that although the flo...
^^^
Line 19, column 241, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mical materials are found in the chamber is resemble the modern
^^
Line 19, column 245, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l materials are found in the chamber is resemble the modern
^^
Line 19, column 247, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'resembled'.
Suggestion: resembled
...materials are found in the chamber is resemble the modern
^^^^^^^^
Line 19, column 266, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in the chamber is resemble the modern
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, really, second, secondly, so, kind of, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1096.0 1373.03311258 80% => OK
No of words: 219.0 270.72406181 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00456621005 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.15300556338 2.5805825403 83% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 145.348785872 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511415525114 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 314.1 419.366225166 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.1710627905 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.2857142857 110.228320801 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6428571429 21.698381199 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06452816374 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.083219128495 0.272083759551 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0333993525656 0.0996497079465 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0299214856163 0.0662205650399 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0518866424297 0.162205337803 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0161325311547 0.0443174109184 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.3589403974 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 53.8541721854 136% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 11.0289183223 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.