Some people claim that not enough of waste from home is recycled. They say that the only way of increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
These days, the amount of waste production at home has not recycled effectively, and therefore the only possible solution to tackle this issue is considered is the introduction of legal laws by officials which contributes for the increase of recycle rate. While I agree that the encouragement by governments to recycle more waste has lofty benefits, however there are also mere disadvantages which we discuss below.
As for increasing recycling in dwelling place, in the countries several laws should be introduced. Generally, the enforcement of these laws could be as much as effortless which means that the regulation would be equal and straightforward to everybody. Another benefit of introducing laws can be helpful to establish a daily habit in citizens which will lead to a regular recycling at home. The last but not least, housekeepers will have lucrative jobs if the government supports them by enforcing laws with individuals’ interests.
In contrast, despite having beneficial sides, it would be unfair to equally enforce laws without any exclusions. There is needed alternative solutions to address this issue. As an example, people who have not produced waste are not able to increase recycling comparing to those producing the massive amount of waste and the increase of recycling, therefore, cannot be achieved by enforcing laws. These introduced laws may create other more serious problems such as dumping unnecessary and excessive waste and this also means that people may be severely pressured to recycle more than they can actually do.
To sum up, making people recycling of their waste is a controversial issue. Having had some minor drawbacks, the introduction of laws seems the only solution for the growth of recycling rate and making householders’ jobs profitable.
- The table below highlights data on the number of travellers using three major British airports between 1998 and 2003. 84
- ‘The Internet will never replace traditional course books in schools.’How far do you agree with this prediction? 84
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- Some hold the view that ideas and information should be completely open and there should be no controls on what people can read and watch in the media TV newspapers Internet Do you agree with this view or do you think that in some circumstances government 54
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2020 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, as for, in contrast, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1525.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38869257951 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09910713475 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586572438163 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1238709364 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.083333333 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5833333333 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338595052821 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126385569963 0.084324248473 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0866015021069 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220608098098 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0723067668303 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.