Some employers offer their employees subsidised membership of gyms and sports clubs, believing that this will make their staff healthier and thus more effective at work. Other employers see no benefit in doing so. Consider the arguments from both aspects of this possible debate, and reach a conclusion.
It seems that employers are constantly trying to find some effective ways to improve their employee’s productivity and one of these cases is an encouraging of the healthy lifestyle for workers by subsiDISING A GYM subscription. However, this method has as its advantages, so a number of disadvantages, which will be provided in this essay.
On the one hand, from the first sight it could be fair to promote being fitter among the employees. Supporters are likely to claim that if workers WERE sporty, they WOULD tend to feel less stressed, more concentrateD and contented, which leads to the higher quality of jobS’ outputs. Furthermore, the social nature’s increments may be more motivating for the stAff as it shows that members of the company are cared for by the managers. By contrast to the financial work pursuits such as incentives, perks and funding rewards, which are HARD to achieve, the seasonal tickets to the sports clubs might contribute to the loyalty of the workers and enhance a team spirit.
Oppositely, the problem with the leisure-oriented contributions is that their profit is superficial and hard to count. The employers can clearly see the objective, which are reached or not, and for these goals they could stay INVOLVE the payments that devote a motivation of the clerks. This tendS to be more adequate in job relationships, where the main purpose is the development of the company. In addition, the similar function could fulfil appropriate job training and day release programmes, which would assist the employees’ work skills and job prospects. Also it might reduce the risk of redundancy, if the firm restructures or downsizes.
It is logical to conclude that despite of HEALTH-focused subsidIES may well increase the employee’s motivation and efficacy, the target-related bonuses and ongoing training have remained more significant for FINANCE spending of the HR budget. It appears that the chairs should think about the development of the whole processing rather than satisfaction of individuals.
- A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honour kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 70
- Some employers offer their employees subsidised membership of gyms and sports clubs, believing that this will make their staff healthier and thus more effective at work. Other employers see no benefit in doing so. Consider the arguments from both aspects 84
- The best way to educate children is not using the Internet in every lesson. To what extent do you share this opinion? What other ways are there of making lessons effective for children? 61
- All children should learn to speak a foreign language as soon as they start school. how far do you agree with this proposal? How important is it for a child to learn a foreign language? 89
- Some people feel that boarding schools (where students or pupils live at the school during the term) are an excellent option for children, while other people disagree for a number of reasons.Consider both sides of this debate and reach a conclusion. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...which will be provided in this essay. On the one hand, from the first sight it...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he workers and enhance a team spirit. Oppositely, the problem with the leisure...
^^^^
Line 9, column 569, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...es' work skills and job prospects. Also it might reduce the risk of redundancy,...
^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f the firm restructures or downsizes. It is logical to conclude that despite o...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, well, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1742.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34355828221 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2003142606 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598159509202 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.6620350996 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.0 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0769230769 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07692307692 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154223506519 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0471425663662 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438766149063 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.094566082802 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0673395573776 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.