Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All children should be required to take a foreign language class from the time they start school until they begin university. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Over the last few decades, language enhanced the communication skills among humanity. Exposing children to other languages at early stage is an immense benefit to them. I agree with the idea that children should be asked to take foreign language class at the beginning of their education to their university level. I feel this way for several reasons, which I will explain in the following paragraphs.
First, it assists the child speaks like a native speaker. As children growing, they have the capacity to assimilate fast and also imitate easily. Teaching them foreign language at early life will give them the opportunity of learning the language quick and speak it like language owner. Moreover, taking them this language to their university level will also help them to have longer time to master the language. For example, my cousin started learning Danish at 3 years, he was opportune to learn till the time he gained admission into university. He speaks Danish fluently and was able to meet one of his lecturers that came from Denmark who assisted him for employment after graduating.
Secondly, it gives self-confidence of meeting people. Children like an environment where they can express themselves. Learning a foreign language will make it easy to associate with people that speak the same language, this will motivate them and give boldness of relating to people around them. My personal experience as an example, I speak Spanish fluently because I was required to take it as one of my subjects when in primary school. This make me happier relating with people that speak this language which has brought me excellent achievements.
In conclusion, I strongly belief that foreign language class should be introduced at early age till university day because it enhances the fluency of the language and also give self confidence in relating with people of the same language.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-03-25 | zty | 73 | view |
2020-02-07 | adejoke | 78 | view |
2019-01-07 | vivianrodriguez1974 | 70 | view |
2019-01-07 | vivianrodriguez1974 | 70 | view |
2018-12-03 | Dat_Nguyen | 70 | view |
- the graph shows the transport mode in a European city from 1960 to 2000
- Do you agree or disagree In the twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement All children should be required to take a foreign language class from the time they start school until they begin university Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement My lifestyle is easier and more comfortable than the one my grandparents experienced when they were young Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice 76
- Some people think that human needs for farmland housing and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals Do you agree or disagree with this point of view Why or why not Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 403, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll explain in the following paragraphs. First, it assists the child speaks like ...
^^^
Line 4, column 239, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ating with people of the same language.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, i feel, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1581.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 309.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11650485437 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68488685446 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 212.727598566 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537216828479 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.336395881 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8125 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3125 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1875 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208945636223 0.236089414692 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681997491706 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064605886335 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140843602988 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384516055871 0.0645574589148 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.