It is easier to be well-educated today than it was in the past.
Past decades have witnessed unprecedented development in education. Nowadays, people attach greater importance to cultivating the next generation, since it contributes to quickly hunting a decent job ad living in a comfortable life in the future. Some people claim that children are easier to be well-educated in the past. However, from my point of view, I could not agree with them.
Firstly, the prevalence of the Internet enables people to have access to various ways to master knowledge. Several years ago, teaching information is fairly messy, and students often had hard time collecting resources. They could find them in reference books, journals, and newspapers, cutting them down, writing notes, and preserving them carefully. However, compared with the current situation, with the widespread use of electronic devices such as mobile phones, digital dictionary, and the computer, people can search for relevant content at a click of the mouse. Additionally, online classes provide people with an opportunity to study comprehensive knowledge whenever and wherever. Evidently, modern technology and the convenient Internet make education more easily for people.
Furthermore, the government has taken the role to help cultivate the talent, which indicates abundant teaching resources have emerged to facilitating teaching, making it easier to raise the general education level. To illustrate, in China, since the early 20th century, the government has been implementing nine-year compulsory education that requires local government to set budgets for covering the expenses of elementary school and junior high school. Consequently, the advance teaching facilities, up-to-date laboratories have been set up in the majority of Chinese schools, which contribute to teaching.
Taking the analysis above into consideration, I would reiterate my standpoint that it is easier to be well-educated in this day and age. One reason is that people have access to a convenient Internet. Another reason is the governments’ contribution.
- it is better to travel to foreign countries when you are young than when you are older 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Younger school children aged five to ten should be required to study art and music in addition to math science history and language 90
- It is easier to be well educated today than it was in the past 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement After high school students should have at least one year to work or travel It s better than attending university straight away 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Sometimes people think nowadays the media TV newspaper Internet are less concerned about the accuracy of news than in the past and the incorrect information may cause more problem to the public 69
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, well, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 43.0788530466 39% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1739.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 302.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.7582781457 4.8611393121 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12598390283 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.658940397351 0.524837075471 126% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.0885302254 48.9658058833 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.6875 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155975316774 0.236089414692 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0555185923446 0.076458572812 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109879753774 0.0737576698707 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108109755614 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0714260504031 0.0645574589148 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 11.7677419355 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 58.1214874552 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 10.9000537634 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.28 8.01818996416 128% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.247311828 156% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.