Task 2: Countries should try to produce all the food for the population and imports as little food as possible. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Populaces deem that every nation should cogitate in term of supplying nourishment for domestic inhabitants and exotic foodstuff should be less prevalent as much as possible while the consumption of imported food has gained increasing popularity in recent years. I unequivocally diverge with this attitude. There are various rationale will be analyzed in this essay in order to corroborate my perspective that it is unfeasible for several countries to victual the entire population as well as alien food is also instrumental in contributing to a well-rounded meal.
First of all, it is virtually impossible to assume responsibility for adequate food for the entire population due to a wide range of poor environmental conditions. Soil, weather condition, cultivated lands and demographics of a country could determine the productivity of manufacturing food as well. Not every country has appropriate conditions to progress the agriculture; consequently, importing food is indispensable to diversify the repasts, especially banquets. Currently, unfortunately, over hundreds of countries are on the verge of destitution, poverty and famine because of catastrophe; hence, importing food is the fundamental and vital problem that every nation necessitates.
As a consequence, obliging the government to provide sufficient sustenance for the whole population is out of the question; therefore, purchasing food from abroad is essential. Additionally, people in richer countries can reap a lot of benefits from imported food. Primarily, importing nourishment can expand the range of food choices of indigenous consumers. Furthermore, it makes an enormous contribution in assisting the autochthonic residents in order to adapt to overseas diet. Besides, facilitating foreigners to be able to eat multinational cuisines is the other advantageous corollary. From the aforementioned, importing food has its own advantages and the government should consider about food importing affair aim to meet indigenous people’s needs.
In conclusion, I do suggest that the government should still produce food as much as possible. However, some countries cannot victual adequately for their inhabitants. Thus, importing sustenance is significant and crucial aspire to satisfy the citizens’ requirements.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-01 | quynhnhi280103 | 67 | view |
| 2020-02-09 | crystalrichard | 84 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 325, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'rationales'?
Suggestion: rationales
...e with this attitude. There are various rationale will be analyzed in this essay in order...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, in conclusion, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1962.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.90963855422 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.48606811819 2.80592935109 124% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602409638554 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 624.6 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.0230551892 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.625 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.625 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361243604484 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107831481185 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663880961702 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214834393185 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0227661220292 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 50.2224549098 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.0 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.34 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.