Government should invest on teaching science subjects rather than other subject for country develop and progress . To what extend do you agree or not agree
Nowadays many people believed that education of science should be expenditure over others by the government for the reason that it significantly contributed to the well-being of one's nation. In my opinion, while the authority should invest in the science-based subjects, it has better not neglecting other fields
On the one hand, there is a variety of explanations about emphasizing science subjects is vital for one's nation. First and foremost, it plays an important role in boosting numerous aspects of society. It is undoubtedly true that many breakthroughs strongly depended on science knowledge in mathematic, physic or chemical. By the way of illustrations, medication quality cannot be improved without an in-depth understanding of chemical and biology. Another reason is that teaching science subjects properly is the first step to have a highly trained intellectual workforce, which pushes the country forward. Science subjects improve learner's logical thinkings and problem-solving skills. Therefore, it is the first step to have great scientists who will come up with technological innovation.
Nevertheless, the essential of non-science knowledge should not be underestimated. In the first place, overemphasize on subjects related to science lead to an uncomprehensive development of pupils. There seem to be shreds of evidence that students can disregard non-science subjects and only focus on the science one. Furthermore, it may result in an imbalanced distribution of occupations due to lack of non-science specialists such as attorneys, journalists or historians. Secondly, along with with with the globalization, the foreign language is requisite for those countries to gain a competitive edge over others. As international trade have a pivotal role in both economic and academic development, the linguistic barrier can be a great obstacle. This is shown by several documents is written in English and cannot be found in other languages.
To sum up, while education in science is important due to its contribution to the various aspects of life in a nation and high-quality workforce training. However, overfocusing on this will lead to uneven development and lack of foreign language knowledge will hamper international trade
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-06 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 61 | view |
| 2020-02-10 | longpm2k | 73 | view |
- There is no future for public transport, because travelling by car is so much more convenient.Write your composition. 78
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying 73
- In many countries today people in cities either live alone or in small family units rather than in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 84
- Many developing countries are currently expanding their tourist industries Why is this the case Is it a positive development 76
- Some people think that planning for future is a waste of time They believe it is more important to focus on the present To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 67, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean ''?
...ved that education of science should be expenditure over others by the government for the r...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 179, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...cantly contributed to the well-being of ones nation. In my opinion, while the author...
^^^^
Line 3, column 101, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...phasizing science subjects is vital for ones nation. First and foremost, it plays an...
^^^^
Line 5, column 492, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: with
...rnalists or historians. Secondly, along with with with the globalization, the foreign lan...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, such as, by the way, in my opinion, to sum up, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.3376753507 288% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1921.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38065302551 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558823529412 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 592.2 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3579087694 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.88235294118 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20858832029 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0645125242068 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593064519298 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124126143868 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051666582944 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.