Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

It goes without saying that in this progressive and sophisticated era when we live, making a long-term relationship is so hard and inaccessible. In this line of thought, while some people hold the opinion that telling truth is very important in every circumstance, others stand at the other side of this continuum, believing that telling with lies in some situation is vital. Personally speaking, I agree with the first opinion. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.

To begin with, in my view, mutual respect and honesty are the main pillars of any relationship such as family and working relationships, to name but a few. Psychologically, telling truth can increase people’s mental calmness because they will not worry about the consequences of revealing the lie that they had told, in the past. Then, stress’s people would decrease and their happiness would increase. To put it in more vivid picture, my uncle was executive of a company. When his company had been bust, he had told truth to other partnerships. Therefore, all of his partnerships had gathered to make a decision that ends up to compensate for the money that busting were imposing them. Had he not said his partnerships, he had to endure the stress that due to their reaction, when was realizing this lie.

Another equally significant reason to be expressed is that nowadays is so difficult to find loyal friends and make long-term friendship as one of the relationships that every one of us needs. Honesty is the main factor that ends up to keep older friends. the more honest, the longer friendship. Moreover, even new friends will separate from us, if they know that we tell lie. For example, while l and old friend, Mary, had been in the ninth years of friendship, she heard about the lie that I had told to her and this problem led to we separated. After separating from Mary, I had been very solitary. I tried to make a new friend but I not found. If I had told the truth, I had not had to be alone.

In conclusion, taking two above-mentioned reasons into account, I agree that telling truth is a vital factor in any relationship. With honesty, people do not worry about revealing their lies and they can make long-term friendships.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-11-19 nha1806 view
2023-06-05 YasamanEsml 70 view
2023-06-05 YasamanEsml 70 view
2023-04-10 sonyeoso 78 view
2023-01-18 theprasad 70 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user bahar_93 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 783, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...stress that due to their reaction, when was realizing this lie. Another equally significa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reaction, when was realizing this lie. Another equally significant reason to be...
^^^
Line 5, column 256, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...tor that ends up to keep older friends. the more honest, the longer friendship. Mor...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, while, for example, i feel, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in my view, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1871.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 391.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78516624041 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85338106089 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537084398977 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9483670175 48.9658058833 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0952380952 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.619047619 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138125663487 0.236089414692 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0410144671509 0.076458572812 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486755561148 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108956623836 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.064373242839 0.0645574589148 100% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.