If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying.
Humans spend a large part of lives in a job. Respective researchers explained that "coworkers influence on each other, and then they could create a relationship affecting their lives" (New York Times). York times). In my perspective, people should give more time for finding a decent career that makes them happier. There are reasons, and I enjoy exploring a good portion of them.
As a priority, when you wait to seek an excellent job, you reach a job being more favourable and attractive, so love it. Because you love it, you promote it. For example, after my friend Andy graduated from university, he looked for work. After a while, he had an offering. I did not accept it in that he does not like it. In the upcoming event, he figured out a career that he loved it, and just after a while; he innovated a new method in his company. Also, good work makes a suitable salary for people. Thus, he compensates time that he searches for a job. At the end of the day, it can gain good money that is important for humans. Hence, by waiting for a great job, you find a proper profession.
Moreover, by putting more time in finding an interesting job, individuals are capable of flourish in their lives. They could meet a lot of experience and knowledge. Therefore, in forthcoming incidents, people use these sciences to solve their problems or thrive in their work. Besides, people in a great job get familiar with new friends and colleagues. They not only help people but also stimulate them for thriving. For instance, since having a high-level career such as work at the university, people become familiar with new researchers. In the future, if they hit with an arduous difficulty, they could help them. It, also, participates in their project too and gets fresh experience.
On the other hand, waiting for a remarkable job means you should spend more time and money. These days' life is competitive, and people compete for new resources. If you have problems with subsisting, secure work could be a considerable option. However, I believe, we could handle a situation to find a job.
As a result, people are better to stay for finding proper work because it is a remarkable part of life and causes people to prosper. Similarly, when people attempt in a job that they love it, and it is interesting, they flourish. I suggested that during waiting for an excellent job, people increase and develop their knowledge by learning computer science because it is a necessary skill, which you need in all jobs.
- It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts. 70
- If people have the opportunity to get a secure job they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying 56
- All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is Use reasons and examples to support your answer 82
- If people have the opportunity to get a secure job they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying 56
- If people have the opportunity to get a secure job they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 99, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'days'' or 'day's'?
Suggestion: days'; day's
...should spend more time and money. These days life is competitive, and people compete...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, look, moreover, similarly, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 62.0 43.0788530466 144% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2076.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 436.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76146788991 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56953094068 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74665324197 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51376146789 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 648.0 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 3.51792114695 284% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.6477539954 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.5862068966 100.406767564 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0344827586 20.6045352989 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75862068966 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 11.8709677419 168% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292687857826 0.236089414692 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0797584035152 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626101967161 0.0737576698707 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182423742966 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050072440097 0.0645574589148 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 11.7677419355 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.74 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.