The chart below gives information about the most common sports played in New Zealand in 2002. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the difference in the percentage of boys and girls playing different sports in New Zealand in 2002.
Overall, the proportion of players is not the same between 2 genders in most of the sports. Only tennis and basketball are nearly the same.
Among the girls, 25% of them enjoyed playing netball while another 23% liked swimming. This was followed by basketball and tennis with 7% and 8% respectively, which were smaller than those of boys. Only 6% of girls who played soccer and 5% participate in athletics. While less than 5% of this gender took part in cricket and martial arts, proportion of unspecified sport took up 10% in total.
In contrast, there was a huge difference in netball when only 1% of boys played this sport, while soccer was the most played sport with nearly 25%. Swimming was the second choice of boys, even though less of them took part in this sport than girls. Cricket and martial arts followed with nearly 10%, showing a huge difference in these of the other gender. Basketball and tennis saw a slightly bigger figure of boys, while less than 5% of them enjoyed athletics. About 18% of this gender participated in other sports.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-19 | dhq.testbig | 11 | view |
| 2021-12-03 | trangthang | 78 | view |
| 2020-12-05 | Harkirat123 | 73 | view |
| 2020-12-01 | Jango Jo | 67 | view |
| 2020-08-28 | haihapham2k | 50 | view |
- The chart below gives information about oil production capacity Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000 and the marital status of adult Americans in two of the years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where re 78
- Cinema attendance by age group 78
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 518, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is gender participated in other sports.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 985.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80487804878 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46514790508 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517073170732 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.6560057696 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.0833333333 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0833333333 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.83333333333 5.23603664747 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106145684453 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0423511781665 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541608506741 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0837362451682 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0641638063246 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.1 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.