The chart below gives information about oil production capacity.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the amount of oil produced in six countries between 1990 and 2010.
Overall, the oil production increased during in most of the countries, except for Qatar. The greatest amount of oil was produced in Saudi Arabia while Qatar produced the least.
In 1990, over 8 million of barrels per day was produced in Saudi Arabia, while the figure for Qatar was just around 1 million. During the period, Saudi Arabia experienced a dramatic increase, from approximately 9 million barrels in 2000 to over 14 million barrels in 2010. In contrast, despite a slight rise in 2000, the oil production of Qatar still remained under 2 million barrels per day during the surveyed period.
Iran was the second country to produce oil most, at more than 3 million barrels in 1990. It was followed by the UAE, which produced more than 2 million barrels of oil per day. The figures for the other countries Iraq and Kuwait were around 2 million barrels. All four countries had the same increasing trend, to more than 4 million for Iran, slightly around 4 million for Iraq and the UAE, and finally over 3 million barrels for Kuwait in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-20 | khanhkhanhlhp | 78 | view |
| 2024-12-18 | paula_ngy08 | 61 | view |
| 2024-11-29 | Nguyen Thinh | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-22 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- Cinema attendance by age group 78
- The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000 and the marital status of adult Americans in two of the years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where re 78
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of difference in income between men and women from 1978 to 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, second, still, while, except for, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 948.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76381909548 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43457872254 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492462311558 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.9418620585 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.8 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0472191449042 0.215688989381 22% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0305644597898 0.103423049105 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0290487947366 0.0843802449381 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0464621790482 0.15604864568 30% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254428961493 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, second, still, while, except for, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 948.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76381909548 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43457872254 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492462311558 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.9418620585 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.8 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0472191449042 0.215688989381 22% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0305644597898 0.103423049105 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0290487947366 0.0843802449381 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0464621790482 0.15604864568 30% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254428961493 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.