The charts show average levels of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore.
The bar chart reports how many years in average that Singapore people studied at school, and the pie charts compare the percentages of the highest qualification of adults in this country between 2000 and 2010.
Overall, while Singapore females always spent less time at school in comparison to males, people in Singapore had an increasing number of years in the education system during the period shown. Moreover, among Singapore adults, although over 80% acquired high school qualification or under in 2000, just nearly two-thirds honoured university or master qualification in 2010.
In 2000, adult females averagely had 8 years in school and that figure for males was 9. While the number of years at school for females remained unchanged until 2004, the time for males unceasingly increased during 10 years. In 2010, adult males involved in the school in around 12 years, 4 years longer than females did.
Look at the pie chart in 2000, it can be seen that just half of Singapore adults left school after receiving primary or secondary qualification, at 25.77% and 26.3% respectively. Meanwhile, there was 32.13% of adults completed highschool without attending tertiary education. However, a radical change witnessed in 2010, whereby 30.31% and 32.93% of Singapore adults honoured the highest level as university and master degrees. Other qualifications accounted for lower percentages in Singapore society, at about 19%, 15% and 2%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-01 | quynhhuong656 | 73 | view |
- Nowadays there is a trend that reports of media focus on problems and emergencies rather than positive development Some people think it is harmful to individuals and to society To what extent do you agree or disagree 80
- the flow chart below show the procedure to get the driving license in US 78
- Advertisements are becoming more and more common in everyday life Is it a positive or negative development 89
- Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods While others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging 78
- Some people argue that job satisfaction is more important than job security while others believe that they cannot always expect job satisfaction and a permanent job is more important Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 80
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, moreover, second, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1213.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3201754386 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77465929907 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592105263158 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 354.6 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4332821693 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.3 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254374149858 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0989830670541 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0694775837682 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158077582694 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0604859717382 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, moreover, second, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1213.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3201754386 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77465929907 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592105263158 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 354.6 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4332821693 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.3 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254374149858 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0989830670541 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0694775837682 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158077582694 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0604859717382 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.