What is your idea about lazy journalism that is commonplace in the digitalized world?
Recently, the phenomenon of lazy journalism in the digitalized world and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of a commonplace idea are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that digital publications can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, journalism in the digitalized world can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as the advantages of lazy journalism, are visible. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of efficient ideas. Thus, predicted outcomes of cost-effective methods are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, lazy journalism in the current world can supply the community with negative impacts, which are associated with the reality that the demerits of inefficient approaches are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described the digital press. Hence, predicted outcomes of commonplace ideas are critical.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of lazy journalism in the digitalized world far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of commonplace means prove the significance of accessible publications, but also pinpoint possible implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-02 | sattar_iust | 88 | view |
| 2020-07-29 | Erfan88 | 77 | view |
| 2020-06-28 | Alireza.r.m | 77 | view |
| 2020-02-25 | Alireza.r.m | 77 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | Alireza.r.68 | 88 | view |
- Should wealthy nations help poor countries with food and education or is it the responsibility of poor nations to improve their condition 85
- Some people work for long hours and hard to achieve success and some give importance to free time for them Give your opinion and discuss your views 80
- What is your opinion on deducting marks on the student s work if it is late 85
- What is the role of writing theater plays and discussing ancient writings in the study of high school students 68
- What roles should governments companies and individuals play to combat climate change 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1322.0 1207.87684729 109% => OK
No of words: 232.0 242.827586207 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69827586207 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3212374669 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616379310345 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5577185987 50.4703680194 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.181818182 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0909090909 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312385651427 0.242375264174 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1015826686 0.0925447433944 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0771710141051 0.071462118173 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181505051726 0.151781067708 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0362212884411 0.0609392437508 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.6 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 55.0591133005 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.