Some people believe that teenagers should focus on all school subjects while others think that they should concentrate on the subjects where they do the best or find the most interesting.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In most countries, subjects that a teenager must study are dictated by a strict curriculum and credit system. However, some believe that they must be allowed to focus on those subjects that appeal to them, as opposed to concentrating on all subjects. This essay discusses arguments for both views.
On the one hand, studying a variety of subjects, both liked and disliked, has traditionally thought to inculcate a good work ethic in the student, as well as imbibe them with resilience. Even if they do not score exceptionally well, that effort proves to the student that they can persevere when faced with difficult tasks, a lesson that serves them well throughout their lives. However, as it matters to an overall grade, students are forced to dedicate time and effort to subjects that they may not have a natural inclination towards, which might detract from more pleasurable activities. Also, it is usually harder to focus on subjects one isn’t adept at; thus, they may need additional support from their teachers and family, so that they aren’t discouraged by the difficulty of the task.
On the other hand, students who focus solely on subjects they find interesting, usually have a higher level of motivation, are more self confident due to their successes, and report being more satisfied with their school life. As it involves an engaging topic, students approach the work required with a much more positive attitude, and are willing to put in long hours. However, sticking solely to what one is good at might be detrimental to their overall progress, as they do not learn to deal with unpleasant tasks, something that cannot be avoided in the future. They also may not possess skills that are taught by disliked subjects, which may leave them at a deficit later on.
In my opinion, students should study all subjects, including those they find appealing as it leads to more holistic development. If they are weak in a particular subject, remedial lessons should be available to them, so that they can achieve their potential across the board.
To recapitulate, studying all subjects a school may be more demanding, but teaches one tenacity, whereas studying only those subjects that are of interest may be more engaging, but might limit the exposure a student has.
- Write a letter to a friend whose birthday party you missed In you letter include An apology Why you missed it Questions about how fun it was 73
- People are now living in a throwaway society where things are used for a short period of time and then thrown away What are the causes of this and what problems does it cause 60
- Experts claim that if older people do more exercise they will be healthier and happier However many elderly people suffer from a lack of fitness What are the causes of this and what are some possible solutions 89
- Some people say that parents should encourage their children to take part in organized group activities in their free time Others say that it is important for children to learn how to occupy themselves on their own Discuss both these views and give your o 78
- Many developing countries are expanding their tourist industries Why is this Is this a positive development 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, thus, well, whereas, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 44.0 24.0651302605 183% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1912.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 380.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03157894737 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66552318512 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534210526316 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 2.10420841683 428% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.0267275503 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.571428571 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1428571429 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276374618855 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102905358032 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064744506773 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175462545267 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0674187881853 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 50.2224549098 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.