Despite the environmental concerns raised by scientists, people are not changing their life style.
Why so? What should be done to encourage the people in order to save environment?
It is true that nowadays people are unaware of their actions creating a negative impact on the environment. Although, I believe that individuals do not have enough knowledge about recycling and how to take care of our planet. In fact, governments could introduce laws and educational programs to teach people the importance of recycling on a daily basis.
In my opinion, lack of knowledge can affect how people take care of our planet. Firstly, educational programs could be introduced at schools to teach students how to recycle, and also what could be done to minimize pollution in our planet. For example, teaching children about global warming is a way to grow them up with the awareness of the problems and the solutions for it. In addition, homework regarding environmental issues could be given to set an example for parents to practice with their children at home. Secondly, human beings tend to do what is easier for them not changing poor habits. For instance, instead of cooperating people normally throw tons of garbage on the streets and do not recycle at home.
On the other hand, governments could implement rules and regulations together with recycling training in every neighborhood. In the first place, once rules are introduced the responsible officer would check and monitor if people are recycling correctly as it was taught in the training, in case rules are not being followed fines would be applied to the individuals that are not respecting the law. In fact, governments should do a public service announcement to influence people’s habits. Perhaps, if we do not recycle paper then every time we need more paper trees get chopped down and this process not only depletes our resources but it also destroys the natural habitats. Besides, a plastic bottle can take at least 450 years to decompose. This is to say, if people learn the importance of converting waste into reusable material, homeowners could start to segregate their trash at home, and also stop throwing garbage on the streets. As a result, these actions could lead to a clean, waste- free environment for everyone.
In conclusion, while people do not change poor habits due to convenience and lack of knowledge about global warming. Rules, regulations, campaigns, and training can be introduced in the neighborhoods. In the long run, the population can learn and understand the importance of recycling and how to take better care of our planet.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-26 | caroll.drigues | 79 | view |
- In education and employment some people work harder than others Why do some people work harder Is it always a good thing to work hard 73
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment What can governments do to address these problems What can individuals people so 84
- Despite the environmental concerns raised by scientists people are not changing their life style Why so What should be done to encourage the people in order to save environment 79
- Happiness is considered very important in life Why is it difficult to define What factors are important in achieving happiness 72
- Nowadays many students choose to study abroad at university level Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of studying abroad and give your opinion about whether it is a good idea 68
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, while, at least, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, in my opinion, it is true, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2041.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 403.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06451612903 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81237677873 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523573200993 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 628.2 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9835498127 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.421052632 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2105263158 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4736842105 7.06120827912 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164634110209 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549222488537 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451644587768 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105953530503 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0223402894648 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.