Scientists agree that many people are eating too much junk food and it is damaging their health. Some people think that this problems can be solved by educating people to eat less junk food. Other people believe that education will not work.
Discuss both opinions and give your own opinion.
Scientist share a similar point of view regarding the negative consequences led by processed-food consumption. While numerous people reckon that the best method to prevent people from consuming this type of food is mass education, others consider that another approach is supposed to be applied to tackle this issue.
On the one hand, some people believe that informing public about health-related issues caused by fast-food consumption behaviour is the most effective way to cut down this habit in the community as numerous individuals will acquire knowledge about this matter. Recent research indicates that just a small number of people possess profound insight regarding the effects brings out by junk food. Thus, by educating them, they may lessen their habit which eventually lowering the risk suffering several illnesses such as obesity and hypertension.
On the other hands, it can be argued that other approaches such as restricted processed food chain are a more practical measure to be implemented. this is mainly because there is no fast food outlet in the community so that the consumer will not be tempted to purchase it. another, strategy worth to try is by increasing food tax. this way, the consumer will reluctant to buy the food because they have to pay an additional cost. As a result, this prevents people from eating this type of food.
To sum up, it seems to me that public education about the health problems contributed by processed food is one of the methods worth to consider. However, I am also convinced that curtailed fast food outlet as well as increasing fast food retribution are more reliable steps to prevent people from developing health issues resulted from this eating habit.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-26 | Wardiati Yusuf | 73 | view |
- Childcare training courses should be mandatory for all parents Do you agree or disagree with this statement Give your own opinion and include relevant examples 61
- The chart illustrates average CO2 emissions per person in four European countries between 1975 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparison where relevant 67
- The graph below shows UK air pollutants measured in million tonnes from three different sources between 1990 and 2005 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The education you receive from your family is more important than the education you receive from school 56
- Fewer and fewer people today right by hand using a pen pencil or brush What are the reasons Is this a positive or a negative development 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 298, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...er. Recent research indicates that just a small number of people possess profound insight regardi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 148, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...re practical measure to be implemented. this is mainly because there is no fast food...
^^^^
Line 5, column 332, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...worth to try is by increasing food tax. this way, the consumer will reluctant to buy...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, may, regarding, so, thus, well, while, such as, as a result, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1445.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16071428571 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73310907285 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596428571429 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.0868612049 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.416666667 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0833333333 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369785802095 0.244688304435 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132396065036 0.084324248473 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068303218505 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227952088095 0.151304729494 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0146968992061 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.