Some people believe online reading materials should only be used for a child to learn to read, whereas others believe only printed material should be used. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In this day and age, studying online is a conspicuous trend that is essential for a child’s growth and development. While some people argue that children’s learning process should be strictly online, others believe that books should be utilized. In my perspective, these studying methods should be used interchangeably to achieve efficacy.
Electronic books could be a dynamic tool as they provide children with a wide range of sources and interactive features to promote language and literacy development. Firstly, it is undoubtedly about the resourcefulness of online study. When studying online, children would be able to access a wide variety of information from different sources within a limited time. For example, students could search for information from websites with no charge such as Google, Wikipedia, and Baidu. Besides, the difference between an eBook and a print book is that an eBook includes different forms of animation, visual displays, narration, and different sounds. These features not only gain a child’s interest but also may help develop children as learners.
However, printed books are very efficient in terms of readability and preference. Firstly, students tend to absorb more when they’re reading on paper than on screen. This phenomenon would since children could scan through and flip through media screens, reducing one’s ability to remember key details and build connections with the text. Additionally, students usually prefer reading from paper. The reason for choosing a print text over an eBook would be due to the fact that the brightness of the screen bothers the child’s vision, children cannot focus on a screen for more than a short time, and games and apps may be too distracting for the child.
In conclusion, online studying and simultaneously using textbooks are vital because of resource availability and comprehensive reading. Therefore, combining both methods would be the ultimate solution for children to develop literacy skills.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-08 | hannahbui | 84 | view |
| 2020-07-12 | MAHIR VHORA | 84 | view |
| 2020-07-08 | JennySmith | 61 | view |
| 2020-07-08 | JennySmith | 61 | view |
| 2020-06-15 | sheetal340 | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 242, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or children to develop literacy skills.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1692.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49350649351 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92030249093 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594155844156 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9544054285 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.75 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9375 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255898827264 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0760700683141 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0733885389565 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162111028925 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0951273669386 0.056905535591 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.