Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Company should pay for employees to get university degree.
Successful companies around the world have concentration sincerely on their employees to pay to get a university degree. It is tangible that they take advantage of this matter. This benefit can be defined by two aspects as economic and background knowledge. So, I agree with this issue, and this essay attends to examine a couple of perspectives.
In the first step, all companies can increase their level of knowledge among other companies. A way of explanation, manufacture under supervision of the company needs an expert to handle many problems in the production of production before exporting. Notably, in research and development, employees can play an essential role in the context of research and development. For instance, in-car factories, cars have been designed annually and newly with a range of options like GPS for finding the natural path that can attract costumers. However, it needs a vast updated background knowledge. To Sum up, I agree with the high level of information for learning at university.
From economic aspects, a huge budget can be ignored for hiring a new employee, and the companies can use their own clerk to developing their goods. Because finding this kind of person needs more time and wasting the amount of money for this purpose. Besides, the marking and trading follow managing the money and time. Especially in the clothing industry, for example, Nike or Adidas have been a brand, and most of the employees should pass a significant course to the university to keep their position every time. Nonetheless, some huge brands have their own university to develop their production. As a result, I believe that one of the successful ways for companies is determined constant money for the employee.
Additionally, sometimes it is not necessary to spend the money for the academic degree for human resources. In other words, in developing countries that have a weak educational system is essential to hire experts to the companies. Nevertheless, spending money on a few companies which are famous around the world is crucial to allocate the amount of money for education and develop regarding increase the benefit of trading. Consequently, even pay for companies should be relevant, but some countries prefer to maintain the storage of income for their future.
In conclusion, I agree with paying for a degree university in the companies for two goals. Besides, half of the money which is investing in courses at the university, Finally it goes back again with great benefit in the marking, if the companies follow for this path.
- After making a presentation in class you want to evaluate it Which of the following do you think would be better for you 1 Watch the recording by yourself 2 Invite other attenders to discuss and give opinions 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Company should pay for employees to get university degree 67
- The most important responsibility of higher education is to prepare students their future jobs do you agree or disagree 73
- Today many people continue to do a part time job after being retired sometimes in the same place and sometimes for another organisation Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It s a waste of money for Government to fund space travel or space exploration 87
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, finally, first, however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, regarding, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2155.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 420.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13095238095 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88121899593 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516666666667 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 678.6 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8542308925 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9545454545 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0909090909 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 5.45110844103 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29689879709 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0888398424697 0.076458572812 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0932880169135 0.0737576698707 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182637675008 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0731115131253 0.0645574589148 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, finally, first, however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, regarding, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2155.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 420.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13095238095 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88121899593 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516666666667 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 678.6 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8542308925 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9545454545 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0909090909 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 5.45110844103 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29689879709 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0888398424697 0.076458572812 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0932880169135 0.0737576698707 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182637675008 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0731115131253 0.0645574589148 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.