Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce
the amount of packaging of goods. Others argue that customers should avoid buying
goods with a lot of packaging. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Plastic is the leading cause of pollution and its use should be regulated. In this essay, I will discuss whether companies or customers should have the responsibility to avoid over-packaging.
On the one hand, the main reason why manufacturers and supermarkets should take responsibility lies in the fact that they often pack their products for protection from damage during the distribution or storage. Of course, there are some alternative options with environmental benefits, but using plastic is more lucrative. Therefore, many people think that they must cover the cost of recycling and collecting packaging materials, especially plastic. Otherwise, supermarkets or retailers should offer discounts to customers who purchase either products with disposable and eco-friendly package or ones without a package.
On the other hand, I think that customers should start avoiding such unnecessary overpacking of products. Many people prefer over-packaged products as they believe more packaging can protect products like foods from contamination and give them a more hygienic feeling. However, over-packaged is unnecessary, and this is just a common misconception that needs to be dispelled. Unless consumer behavior changes, the amount of packaging of goods will be increasing, let alone reducing it. Also, customers can avoid buying over-packaged goods, making consumer pressure on manufacturers and sellers. For example, many supermarkets and restaurants now use fewer plastic containers and use more recycled paper under consumer pressure.
In conclusion, although it is important to make manufacturers and supermarkets responsible for overpackaging, customers should take matters into their own hands and reduce the consumption of products that require more packaging.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | quynhu | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | quynhu | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | RkmsU | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-06 | viviannguyen | 61 | view |
- It has been said that people who read for pleasure have more developed imaginations and better language skills than people who prefer to watch TV Do you agree or disagree 67
- Today food travels from thousands of miles from the farm to the consumer Some people say that it would be better for the economy and environment if people ate food produced from local farmers 84
- Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The table below shows the results of a 20 year study into why adults in the UK attend arts events 73
- Today food travels from thousands of miles from the farm to the consumer Some people say that it would be better for the economy and environment if people ate food produced from local farmers 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, therefore, for example, i think, in conclusion, of course, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1518.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.88372093023 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28313563969 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.62015503876 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.998830313 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.769230769 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8461538462 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.69230769231 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313877413564 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105552745889 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052962928113 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176495257583 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456588879647 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.82 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.